MMAK, LLC Appeal 2019-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r k i i IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax RECEIVED MMAK, LLC, ) MAR 2 6 1021 ) TC-MD 210003N MARION COUNTY Plaintiff, ) ASSESSOR v ) MARION COUNTY ASSESSOR, )) 1 ) Defendant. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL This matter came before the court on its own motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of I prosecution. Plaintiff filed its Complaint on December 31, 2020. In response to an Information 1 Request from the court, Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint on January 14, 2021. On that same day,the court served Defendant a copy of the Amended Complaint. The Notice of Filing 1 accompanying the Amended Complaint stated, "Defendant(s) in this case must respond in 1 I writing to the Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Notice. Tax Court Rule—Magistrate Division (TCR—MD) 2 A." i The court did not receive an answer or response from Defendant within 30 days serving ) the Amended Complaint. TCR—MD 7 G(1) states: "A motion for default may be filed when a defendant has failed to file an answer or a response. The court may notify all parties that defendant failed to file an answer or a response. The plaintiff may submit a motion for default asking that the relief requested in its complaint be granted. Once the motion ion IIf for the fault j is filed,the complaint cannot be amended unless the court appm defendant fails to file an answer or a response within 10 days of the filing of the motion for default,the court will consider the motion and may enter an order of default." ? On February 23, 2021, the court issued a letter to the parties, providing Plaintiff an 1 I opportunity to file a motion for default. The letter also stated that it is the responsibility of the I 1 ORDER TC-MD 210003N 1 1