Laserfiche WebLink
The subject's property is a roughly 90 year-old home in an excellent south Salem neighborhood <br /> surrounded by a blend of older homes that range in age, size, style,quality, and features. The petitioner <br /> is requesting the county lower the Real Market Value of the home to$750,427 which would reflect a 3% <br /> increase from the previous year's RMV. <br /> The subject's home has been on the market for roughly 17 years at$899,000 and the past 3 years at <br /> $850,000; with no offers. As of 12/1/21 it was under contract for a sales price of$723,500. This home <br /> was appraised by the county on June 29, 2021 as part of their seven to ten year cycle rotation. At the <br /> time of this appraisal,the appraiser determined that the home had been updated recently due to <br /> pictures and descriptions from multiple MLS listings starting in 2015 as well as an on-site visit to view <br /> the exterior of the home. Based on this information,the appraiser used their best judgment that the <br /> kitchen and bathroom's had been updated within the past five years and added exception value to the <br /> home to reflect these updates. <br /> The county was able to find three comparable properties that are similar in age,qualities, features, <br /> style, and location and would attract the same type of buyer. All three comparable properties are <br /> located within a mile of the subject; with Comp 1 located only a block away and being the best <br /> comparable. The comparable properties range in adjusted sales price from $612,000 to$719,500. Each <br /> comparable is considerably smaller than the subject with an average of roughly 1,500 square feet less <br /> than the subject. The comparable properties have a range in price per square feet of$111 to$167,with <br /> an average price per square foot of$147. <br /> After looking at the subject property's records and notes in the county's system more closely, it was <br /> determined that the kitchen was remodeled in 2008 and exception value was added at that time. In <br /> addition,the hot tub that was added during the June 29, 2021 visit was already on the account as a <br /> Water Feature. Both of these notes were missed by the appraiser before doing the appraisal on June <br /> 29, 2021. <br /> Based on the data,the comparable properties,additional information provided by the petitioner, and <br /> review of the notes in association with this account,the county recommends we remove the exception <br /> RMV of$47,950 for the kitchen and bath remodel and the inventory RMV of$15,000 for the hot tub, <br /> which were already accounted for in 2008. This will also remove the Exception to the Maximum <br /> Assessed value of$28,540 for the kitchen remodel. In addition, based on the information from the <br /> petitioner, the county recommends reducing the Effective Year Built back to its original year of 1957 to <br /> reflect general maintenance of the home as well as lowering the class of the home to a 6-from a 6. <br /> Based on these recommended changes,the county recommends the RMV value will be lowered to <br /> $805,190 with the land value staying at$123,000 and the improvements lowered to$682,190. This <br /> recommended RMV equates to a price per square foot of approximately$134 which is in the middle of <br /> the comparable property's price per square feet, which the county feels is an appropriate measure to <br /> use on this property. The Maximum Assessed Value will stay at$850,060. The Assessed Value will be <br /> the same as the Real Market Value of$805,190, which is not limited to the 3%maximum increase per <br /> year. Since the home was under contract almost a year after the assessment date of January 1, 2021, <br /> the county did not feel the petitioner's requested RMV amount was reflective of the market as of the <br /> county's assessment date. <br /> 4 <br /> 4 <br /> 4 <br />