PLA24-046 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Marion County Building Inspection Division commented: “No Building Inspection concerns. Permit(s) would be required to be obtained prior to any development and/or utilities installation on private property, if proposed.” Marion County Septic commented: “257 RIVERWOOD DR – This property is getting smaller and is only .35 acres. It has no septic history. A site evaluation is needed to demonstrate that the property can support a replacement area. Along with the Site Evaluation an Existing System Evaluation Report will be required for the existing system. This is to ensure that it is functional and does not cross over the proposed property line.” “263 RIVERWOOD DR – This property is getting larger needs no further action at this time.” Marion County Tax Assessor’s Office provided comments regarding the tax status of the property. All other commenting agencies either stated no objection to the proposal or failed to provide comment. 6. The following regulations shall apply when property line adjustments and partitioning of land regulated by Chapter 16.33 MCC, Subdivision and Partition Requirements, are proposed: a. Additional street right-of-way required by adopted county standards shall be dedicated along the street frontage of any lot 10 acres or less in area that is part of a partition or lot line adjustment. Street and drainage improvements within the dedicated right-of-way shall be deferred until otherwise required by the county, or by the city following annexation. A non-remonstrance agreement for future road or drainage improvements within the right-of-way abutting the lot may be required. The parcels are served by a private road not maintained by the county. The criterion is met. b. The location of lot lines shall not significantly reduce feasible options for the future location of urban streets or utility services, or preclude development options on the property or adjacent properties. The lot line adjustment will not reduce options for future streets or utilities. The adjustment will provide equal river frontage for both properties. The criterion is met. c. When a lot occupied by a residence is reduced, or a lot is created to accommodate a new residence allowed in MCC 16.13.320, the lot should be as small as possible and should not be larger than one acre. If a lot of one acre or less is not feasible, the lot should either contain all of the undeveloped land or be large enough that the urban development potential will be a significant incentive for the owner to develop to planned urban uses when the lot is annexed. The lot being reduced is already under one acre. The criterion is met. d. When a new or adjusted lot located in a residential plan designation is smaller than five acres and larger than one acre, a redevelopment plan shall be required demonstrating that the lot can accommodate future subdivision development at the median density proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning administrator shall review and approve the redevelopment plan. The redevelopment plan is only for the purposes of identifying a feasible means to subdivide the property and to identify an appropriate location for residences, and does not limit consideration of other development options when urban services are available. Both properties are already under the minimum lot size of three acres, so redevelopment may not be feasible and the City of Jefferson designates these parcels as open space in their comprehensive plan. A redevelopment plan is not required in this situation. The criterion is met.