My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Permit - 1264749
Images9
>
Public Works - Permits
>
Building
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
COMPLETED FILES - INACTIVE
>
Old Files 2
>
Permit - 1264749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2011 1:50:47 PM
Creation date
9/2/2003 1:31:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits
Permit Address
20167 GRIM RD NE
Permit City
Aurora
Parcel Number
041W22B 01800
Permit Type
Permit
Extra Information
Publicly Owned
Permit Site Number
North Marion Sch
Permit Doc Type
Permit Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Df:P'L C[ SLDG. INSPECTION <br />.%r.~or Bldg, = 225 <br />~,]20 Hi9h $t, lq,E, <br /> Solem, Oregon 97301 <br /> <br />September 20. 1983 <br /> <br />Mr. Bruce Earn, Superintendent <br />North Marion Middle School <br />20256 Grim Road NE <br />Aurora, Oregon 97002 <br /> <br /> R O O,'-,'~ 22: <br />PHONE 588-51 <br /> 588 5148 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Earn; <br /> <br />At your request a roof and wall inspection of the North Marion Middle School <br />was made September 15, 1983, by I~arion County Building Inspector, Don Woodley. <br /> <br />The following observations were made by Inspector Woodley: <br /> <br />1. The intake for the make-up air is causing a negative air pressure between <br />the concrete wall and the wood frame wall. One solution is to seal the chase <br />tightly at the perimeter of the air intake louver. <br /> <br />2. The existing siding and wall construction appears to meet minimum code <br />requirements.~ It is lapped the proper direction and a vapor barrier appears <br />to be present.' There may be penetrations in the vapor barrier to allow water <br />to enter. The frame wall appears quite flexible and there is a question if <br />it meets the windload requirements for allowable deflection. <br /> <br />3. In numerous places the roofing me~rane shows evidence of separation. <br />The straight line separations appear to be caused by expansion and contraction. <br />There are als'o random Breaks in the top coat. These breaks are short and all <br />fellow a fiberglas, thread. The manufacturer of the roofing material should <br />he c~nsulted on this problem. <br /> <br />4, It should he noted that while the construction of the school in general <br />and the wall in particular Tnay meet code requirements, these code requirements <br />are only a set of minimum standsrds. <br /> <br />If we can be of any further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us. <br /> <br />~RANCIS E. PHELPS <br />SUPERVISING BUILDING INSPECTOR <br /> <br />FEP:cr <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.