Laserfiche WebLink
~EVIEW COM2~ITTEE REPORT <br />Marion County Planning Commission <br />September 25, ]_973 <br /> <br />EXHIBIT <br />Agenda ~tem Noo 3 <br />SPECIAL ~CE~gIO~ CASE NO. 73-31 <br />Piled: August 15, 1973 <br /> <br />].o APPLICA~ITS~ Cyril & Marian <br /> <br />FILED BY~ <br />REQUEST~ <br /> <br />4. LCCATION ~ <br /> <br />Cyril Zuber <br /> <br />To ,~lace a second non-.farm oriented dwelling on a 9 acre <br />Dar~e]. where an existing dwelling already exists in <br />an' F-Z0 (Farm Z0) zone (Section 137~230 of the Marion <br />County Uniform Zone Code) ~ <br /> <br />Route !, BOX 123, .Aumsville, on the south side of MR 32 <br />approximately $00 feet northeast of the intersection of <br />MR 32 and MR $7 ~- Section 18, T9, <br /> <br />5~ LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~ As set forth in application file. <br /> <br />REPORT OF FACTS~ The subject property is gently rolling with the <br />Salem-Stayton Ditch extending along the north property line and a <br />drainage way to the south° <br /> <br />The soils on the property are of the Sifton and McBee series which <br />are considered moderate for agricultural crop production. <br /> <br />The land use pattern of the general area is predominantly agri- <br />cultural with several smaller acreage homesites existing along the <br />Marion-Stayton Road. <br /> <br />It is the desire of the appi~icant to locate a mobile home near the <br />existing c~we!ling to provide a homo for their da.~sh%er and her <br />children,, <br /> <br />Neither the Stayton Area Advisory Committee nor the County Public <br />Works Department has any objections to the proposal. <br /> <br />The County Sanitarian is requesting that a soil pit be dug in <br />the area of the proposed homesite for soil analysis~ <br /> <br />REVIEW CO~4ITTEE CONCLUSIONS: The Committee feels that since the <br />property is marginal for famning, due to both size and scil t~pe <br />an additional homesite for family care would not alter the land <br />use pattern nor materially alter the farming activities in this area. <br /> <br />The Committee does feel, however~ that the existenco of the mobile <br />home on this property should not extend beyond the family use inten- <br />ded. <br /> <br />REVIEW CO~[~ITTEE RECftMMENDATION~ The Committee recomraends that the <br />special e~ception be GRANTED for the specific use of the applicants <br />daughter and children and that any deviation from this intended use <br />would make the permit void. <br /> <br /> <br />