My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Permit - 1278214
Images9
>
Public Works - Permits
>
Building
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
COMPLETED FILES - INACTIVE
>
92-XXXXX
>
Permit - 1278214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2011 2:19:04 PM
Creation date
9/3/2003 1:20:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits
Permit Address
120 SPRUCE CT
Permit City
Aumsville
Permit Number
92-02349
Permit Type
Permit
Extra Information
16
Permit Doc Type
Permit Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Marion County <br /> <br /> OREGON <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br /> DEPARTMENT <br /> <br />sm~c~oR Gary Wicks, Administrator <br />O~igO.'~uedemat~ Building Codes Agency <br /> 1535 Edgewater NW <br />BUILDI~I~SP~ION Salem, Oregon 973~0 <br /> <br />(503) <br /> <br />Subject: Local ~urisdiotion requirements on mobile <br /> home set backs. <br /> <br />Dear Gary; <br /> <br />We have been experiencing difficulty in understanding the <br />Manufactured Structures and Parks regulations, in partic- <br />ular, the setbacks that are required in the parks. We <br />have had numerous phone conversations with various mem- <br />bers of your staff and seem to be getting different <br />answers each time. <br /> <br />You will find attached, a copy of a letter from the City <br />of Aumsville. While Aumsville is not the only jurisdic- <br />tion experiencing these problems, they are asking very <br />similar questions. In addition to the specific questions <br />identified in their letter, I am requesting answers to <br />the following general questions: <br /> <br />Do local jurisdictions have the authority to adopt <br />and enforce greater set back requirements than <br />found in administrative rule? <br /> <br />gxample - an accessory building shall not be <br />located closer than six feet to any mobile <br />home or other accessory building on adjacent <br />space. Can local jurisdiction change the six <br />feet to ten feet? A mobile home may not be <br />closer than five feet to a property line. Can <br />local jurisdiction change the five feet to a <br />greater set back? <br /> <br />Can the State Fire Marshal adopt and enforce <br />regulation for street access and location of <br />hydrants? This issue is not addressed in the <br />administrative rule. <br /> <br />Senator Building 220 High Street NI~ Salem, Oregon 97301-3670 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.