Laserfiche WebLink
PROPOSED MERCANTILE GREENHOUSE WITH CC1 ROOF PLASTIC. <br /> • <br /> Compare Greenhouse to Low Hazard Occupancy Building from 2010 OSSC Ch 26 Sec <br /> 2609.2 and 2609.4 for Area and Percentage of CC1 Roof Plastic. <br /> Allowable coverage of CC1 on Low Hazard Occupancy Building;Area of 5,000 sq. ft., <br /> with No Separation of Panels. <br /> Example,taken from 2010 OSSC 2609.4 Exception 2: A swimming Pool Shelter; <br /> Occupant Load 5,000/50=100 occupants for occupant load under roof portion only. <br /> Proposed building is a total of 6,272 sq. ft.,but only 4,480 sq. ft. of the building is <br /> proposed to be a greenhouse and have CC1 roof plastic. Since greenhouse areas are <br /> separated by an existing building,each area of the greenhouse CC1 roof would be limited <br /> to 2,240 sq. ft. <br /> 1. 2,240 sq. ft. in areas is less than 50%of the allowable roof area of a Low Hazard <br /> Occupancy. Total proposed amount of CC1 on roof is less than allowable on a <br /> Low Hazard Building. <br /> 2. Occupant load of greenhouse 2240/30=75 occupants(actual occupant load should <br /> be less with plant displays),this would require two exits. This would also provide <br /> a maximum travel distance of 70 feet; Exiting from a 5000 sq. ft. pool structure <br /> ® would be approx 71 feet in travel distance. <br /> 3. Exiting from greenhouse structure would be accomplished much faster, since the <br /> occupants would not be restricted by the water in a swimming pool and/or a <br /> structure that is 5,000 sq. ft. in area. <br /> 4. Existing building would not be required to exit through greenhouse areas for any <br /> portion of the Exit System. <br /> Note: Recommendation of two exits equally spaced directly to exterior from each <br /> greenhouse section, in addition to the existing doors of the existing building for <br /> egress. <br /> Proposed greenhouse building is less hazardous than Low Hazard Occupancy due to: <br /> 1. Smaller roof area of plastic panel roofing, <br /> 2. Reduced occupant load, <br /> 3. Reduced travel distance, <br /> 4. Number of exits,and exiting time. <br /> • <br />