My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13000822
Images9
>
Public Works - Permits
>
Building
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
COMPLETED FILES - INACTIVE
>
21-XXXXXX
>
13000822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 8:00:12 PM
Creation date
8/5/2025 11:37:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits
Permit Address
53000 BREITENBUSH RD NE
Permit City
Detroit
Permit Number
555-21-011749-STR
Parcel Number
097E20A 00300
Permit Type
Structural
Extra Information
Alternate Material(s) and/or Method(s)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- - White Paper <br /> si February 2016 J <br /> Building Codes Division <br /> Alternates to Fire Sprinkler Systems <br /> Better Buildings for Oregon <br /> With the passage of Senate Bill 582 in the 2013 session,the legislature noted: "It is in the best interests <br /> of this state that state building code regulations encourage economic development, experimentation, <br /> innovation and cost effectiveness in construction, especially construction in rural or remote parts of this <br /> state." <br /> Accordingly,the Division has been tasked with identifying provisions in the code which are bathers and <br /> developing strategies to simplify processes and reduce obstacles. One such bather is the requirement to <br /> Stall a fire sprinkler system in buildings where water supply is either unavailable or inadequate to <br /> service a code-compliant sprinkler system. <br /> While the state building code provides a process for local building officials to amend or make <br /> exceptions to the code as needed where strict compliance is impractical, there is no guideline for a <br /> uniform or consistent approach for demonstrating that the intent of the code is met where alternate <br /> approaches for the elimination of a sprinkler system is proposed. <br /> Scope: <br /> This white paper is meant to assist in determining the acceptance of equivalent protection to a fire <br /> sprinkler system. The intent is to provide flexibility that allows the use of alternative approaches to <br /> achieve compliance with minimum requirements,provide safeguards for public health,safety, and <br /> welfare.The white paper serves as a supplement to the provisions of OSSC Section 104.10 <br /> Modification: <br /> 104.10 Modifications. Wherever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions <br /> of this code, the building official shall have the authority to grant modifications for individual cases, <br /> upon application of the owner or owner's representative,provided the building official shall first find <br /> that special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical and the modification is in <br /> compliance with the intent and purpose of this code and that such modification does not lessen health, <br /> accessibility, life and fire safety, or structural requirements. The details of action granting modifications <br /> shall be recorded and entered in the files of the department of building safety. <br /> The white paper is not intended to inhibit innovative ideas or technological advances not addressed here, <br /> and the provisions of this white paper do not preclude further application of OSSC Section 104.11 <br /> Alternative materials,design and methods of construction and equipment: <br /> 104.11 Alternative materials,design and methods of construction and equipment. The provisions of <br /> this code are not intended to prevent the installation of any material or to prohibit any design or method <br /> of construction not specifically prescribed by this code,provided that any such alternative has been <br /> approved An alternative material, design or method of construction shall be approved where the <br /> building official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the <br /> provisions of this code, and that the material, method or work offered is,for the purpose intended, at <br /> Building Codes Division ♦ Department of Consumer and Business Services ♦ State of Oregon <br /> 1535 Edgewater St.NW,Salem,OR 97304 ♦P.O.Box 14470,Salem,OR 97309-0404 1 <br /> 503-378-4133 • Fax: 503-378-2322 ♦ oregon.gov/bcd `` A' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.