Laserfiche WebLink
<br />“The property herein described is situated in or near a farm or forest zone or area in Marion County, <br />Oregon, where the intent is to encourage, and minimize conflicts with, farm and forest use. Specifically, <br />residents, property owners and visitors may be subjected to common, customary and accepted farm or <br />forest management practices conducted in accordance with federal and state laws that ordinarily and <br />necessarily produce noise, dust, smoke and other impacts. The grantors, including their heirs, assigns and <br />lessees do hereby accept the potential impacts from farm and forest practices as normal and necessary and <br />part of the risk of establishing a dwelling, structure or use in this area, and acknowledge the need to avoid <br />activities that conflict with nearby farm and forest uses and practices, grantors will not pursue a claim for <br />relief or course of action alleging injury from farming or forest practice for which no action is allowed <br />under ORS 30.936 or 30.937.” <br />This shall be made a condition of approval. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />DELIBERATION: <br /> <br />On May 5th, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing about the proposal to establish a non-farm dwelling on a <br />7.92 acre parcel of land zoned Special Agriculture with an adjustment to MC 17.137.070, Special Setbacks. The staff <br />summary, and staff responses to comments were submitted prior to the hearing. Staff presented this information to the <br />Planning Commission. The applicant representative was then able to present their argument to the commission. There were <br />no objections nor any attendees that wished to offer public comment. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission asked for clarifications on the adjustment to the special setbacks and the purpose of the special <br />setbacks as mentioned in conditions of approval #2. In addition, the Commission asked for clarification about the required <br />setbacks from the lake. Another line of inquiry was why the previous attempts to establish the dwelling were not successful. <br />In 1996 two lot of record dwellings were applied for and only one was granted, however, the applicants never followed <br />through with establishing the dwelling. In 2018 another lot of record dwelling was applied for, at that time the Marion <br />County Hearings Officer denied the lot of record dwelling because the applicants did not meet the requirements for <br />ownership of contiguous property in the same ownership and if the lot was part of a tract of land prior to November 4, 1993. <br />Staff explained that for this case, these were not applicable criteria. There were no other concerns raised. After the Planning <br />Commissioner’s questions were answered, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the application. <br /> <br />DECISION: <br /> <br />At the May 5th, 2026, meeting, after reviewing the testimony in the record and the information provided by Staff and the <br />applicant, a motion was made and seconded to APPROVE the proposal as presented by Staff. The motion passed <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />SIGNED AND FINALIZED THIS May 12th, 2026. <br /> <br /> <br />Brandon Reich Date: May 12th, 2026. <br />Planning Commission Secretary <br /> <br />Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder, Vendor or Seller: ORS Chapter 215 requires that if you receive this Notice, it must <br />promptly be forwarded to the purchaser.