Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The subject parcel does not currently have a dwelling and is undeveloped. Staff has determined that the parcel was legally <br />created and has existed in its current configuration since at least 1979. The parcel has no history of partitions or property <br />line adjustments and has remained in the present configuration since before November 4, 1993. The criteria are met . <br /> <br />3. The dwelling will not materially alter the stability of the overall land use pattern of the area. In making <br />this determination the cumulative impact of possible new non-farm dwellings on other lots or parcels <br />in the area similarly situated shall be considered. To address this standard, the following information <br />shall be provided: <br /> <br />a. Identify a study area for the cumulative impact analysis. The study area shall include at least <br />2,000 acres or a smaller area not less than 1,000 acres, if the smaller area is a distinct <br />agricultural area based on topography, soil types, land use pattern, or the type of farm or ranch <br />operations or practices that distinguish it from other, adjacent agricultural areas. Findings <br />shall describe the study area, its boundaries, the location of the subject parcel within this area, <br />why the selected area is representative of the land use pattern surrounding the subject parcel <br />and is adequate to conduct the analysis required by this standard. Lands zoned for rural <br />residential or other urban or non-resource uses shall not be included in the study area; <br /> <br />b. Identify within the study area the broad types of farm uses (irrigated or non -irrigated crops, <br />pasture or grazing lands), the number, location and type of existing dwellings (farm, non-farm, <br />hardship, etc.), and the dwelling development trends since 1993. Determine the potential <br />number of non-farm dwellings that could be approved under MCC 17.136.050(A), including <br />identification of predominant soil classifications and parcels created prior to January 1, 1993. <br />The findings shall describe the existing land use pattern of the study area including the <br />distribution and arrangement of existing uses and the land use pattern that could result from <br />approval of the possible non-farm dwellings under this provision; <br /> <br />c. Determine whether approval of the proposed non-farm dwellings together with existing non- <br />farm dwellings will materially alter the stability of the land use pattern. The stability of the <br />land use pattern will be materially altered if the cumulative effect of existing and potential non- <br />farm dwellings will make it more difficult for the existing types of farms in the area to continue <br />operation due to diminished opportunities to expand, purchase, or lease farmland, or acquire <br />waste rights or diminish the number of tracts or acreage in farm use in a manner that will <br />destabilize the overall character of the study area. <br /> <br />The applicants were provided a map and data required for a 2,000 acre study. The results were provided as part of the <br />application materials. Because the study area overlaps with the urban growth boundary of the City of Salem and due to the <br />proximity to the city, there are many areas that were not required to be studied. Significant portions designated as AR, P, <br />and P-LU have been excluded from the analysis as stated in MCC 17.137.060(A)(1). These areas are Salem’s eastern <br />neighborhoods along Condon Road and other areas that are zoned for residential uses, industrial uses, and public zoned <br />areas. These general patterns were discussed in section 8.1 above. The applicants representative study area were the <br />contiguous areas of EFU and SA zoned lands. EFU zoned properties extend east along State Street, while SA zoned lands <br />stretch south to Macleay Rd SE, north to Fruitland Rd, and west to Cordon Rd SE. <br /> <br />Within the study area, there are 320 parcels zoned EFU or SA. This includes 126 parcels zoned EFU and 194 parcels zoned <br />SA. The sizes of these parcels range between 0.2 acres and 150.27 acres. The analysis concludes that 73% of the parcels in <br />the study area or 249 parcels are 10 aces or less. While 34 of the parcels in the study area are between 10 and 20 acres. <br />Another 33 parcels are between 20 and 40 acres. Only 4 parcels are 40 acres or more, with only 2 of these parcels being <br />larger than the 80 acres minimum parcel size for newly created parcels in SA or EFU zones. <br /> <br />In the study area there are 193 parcels with dwellings dated pre-January 1, 1993. Fifty-three of these parcels have dwellings <br />constructed after January 1, 1993; these include newly established dwellings, replacement dwellings, hardship dwellings <br />along with a non-farm dwelling. This leaves 75 parcels with no dwellings and out of that, there are 66 parcels that are not <br />developable. The applicant’s representative categorized twenty-four of those 75 as “Rural Restrictive.” These 24 tax lots <br />are mainly SA or EFU zoned land that are under 80 acres and have no dwellings or buildings. Others have accessory