Laserfiche WebLink
Marion County Surveyor’s Office requested the following be made conditions of approval: <br /> <br />1. No survey required for properties greater than ten acres per ORS 92.060 (8). <br />2. Property line adjustment deed(s) shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per <br />ORS 92.190 (4). <br /> <br />Marion County Tax Assessor’s Office provided comments regarding the tax status of the subject properties. <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. <br />These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />None of the subject parcels involved in the proposal are currently over 80 -acres and all parcels are being <br />consolidated into a single parcel. The resultant single parcel will also not be large enough to exceed 80 -acres and <br />will be below the minimum parcel size for the zone. This criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />None of the subject parcels involved in the proposal are currently over 80-acres and all parcels are being <br />consolidated into a single parcel. The resultant single parcel will also not be large enough to exceed 80-acres and <br />will be below the minimum parcel size for the zone. This criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />The proposed configuration eliminates property lines and results in one larger parcel instead of 3 smaller parcels. <br />This configuration makes the area easier and more appealing for commercial agriculture because it provides a larger <br />contiguous area for farming instead of having 3 smaller parcels that could be sold off independently. Therefore the <br />criterion is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common <br />property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains <br />an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant <br />tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to <br />qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br />The proposed property line adjustment will not result in any parcels becoming smaller. It is a consolidation and <br />makes a single, larger parcel. Further, one of the parcels involved currently has a legal dwelling. This will therefore <br />not result in a configuration that qualifies a vacant parcel for a dwelling. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for <br />construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting <br />vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger tha n the minimum tract size <br />required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br />