Laserfiche WebLink
MARION COUNTY BUILDING INSPECTION <br /> <br />DATE/TII~ <br />TYPE <br />OC. CUP~ <br /> <br /> 3150 Lancaster Dr. N.E. · Suite C · Salem, Oregon 97305-1398 <br /> Office Hours: 8:00-4:30 · Phone: (503) 588-5147 · 24oHR Inspection Line: (503) 373-4427 <br /> <br /> SITE EVALUATION I~E#IN_ <br />~g/I§/97 ~7=22 ~Z~L ~ = 97-~B96 <br /> ~T~TUS ~ DEHZE~ <br /> <br /> g 2 <br /> <br /> SITE EVAI.IJATTON DENIAL <br /> <br /> This property has been evaluated for the feasibility of the installation of a septic system <br /> for a REBID~NT~AI. building site. Based on the results of this study, the site does not <br /> qualify for a standard septic system or any of the a]ter'native systems and is DENIED. <br /> Th~ c~nditions on the site do not meet the minimum requirements of the Department of <br /> Fnvtronmenta! Quality On-Site Sewage Disposal RuIes. These rules are specied in Oregon <br /> Administrative Rules, Chapter 34~ Bivision 71, Bection <br /> <br /> Th~ studx was don~ only in the area proposed for on-site sewage disposale as indicated on <br /> the submitted ~ite ~lan. Within the boundaries of the parcel, it is possible that soil <br /> c~nd~tions in a different area of the property may be different than those examined irt <br /> the <br /> <br /> Add~ona~ test pits ~i~] be inspected, at no additional cost~ if a ~ritteo request and <br /> revised ~ite plan is submitted te this office ~ithin <br /> n~ request is submitted f~r re-evaluation within the ?B days~ the DENIAL will stand, <br /> <br />Appeals of thi~ DENIAL must he mede in ~?itin~ directly to the Willamette Valley Regional <br />O~fice of ~he Department of Fnvironmental QuaIity (BFQ), and be accompanied by a <br />permit denial review fee. <br /> <br /> The fo]Io~ng conditions outline the specific reasons for the DENIAL: <br /> <br /> COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS <br />THIS SEPTIC REVIEW WAS COMPLETED BY I.EE GRIMES ON AUGUST 8' <br />1997. IT APPEARS THAT THERF IS NOT ENOUGH AREA WITHIN THE <br />BOUNDARIES OF THESE PARCELS TO SITE THE APPROPRIATE SEPTIC <br />SYSTEM DRAINFIELBS. THE MOST LIMITING FEATURE IS THE SETBACK <br />REQUIREMENT FROM STREAMS AND BITCHES. REFER TO THE SETBACK <br />AND SFPARATION LIST WHICH OUTLINES THF CURRENT MINIMUM STATE <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE ~EWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. THE RE- <br />OUFST FOR OH-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR THE PROPOSED <br />THREE BEDROOM RESIDENCE MIJST BE DENIED. WE WILL RE-CONSIBER <br />THE APPLICATION IF THROiJGH A FIELD STAKEOUT 225' OF STANDARD <br />DRAINFIELD FOR EACH SYSTEM CAN BE SITED OR 75' OF DRAINLIflE <br />FOR EACH A[TERNATIVE SAND FILTER SYSTEM CAN BE LOCATED. <br /> <br /> <br />