My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Contracts/Amendments
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Contracts/Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 11:45:11 AM
Creation date
8/1/2011 4:59:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10059
Title
Contracts/Amendments
Company
Arbuckle/Costic
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Contracts - Agreements
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
November 25. 1998 <br />Billy Wasson <br />project Co-CooodinatorJDi~ector of Corredions <br />Marion County <br />4040 Aumsvilie Highway SE <br />Salem, Oregon 97302 <br />Kim Arbuckle. NA <br />Alan E. Cosdc. AlA <br />Walter E. Bensman. Jr.. AtA <br />Clayton Vorse. AlA <br />Leonard lodder. AlA <br />Richard S. Rotliweiler. AtA <br />a~mard s. eoyd. an <br />Phipip K Settecase. FAtA <br />ARBUCKLE COS17C ARCHITEGTS; -INC. <br />363 St~te Street <br />Salem, OR 97301-3533 <br />503/581-4114. Fax: 503/581-3655 <br />E-Mail: ac.arch@open.org <br />RE: City of Salem <br />PeRnit Application Process and Plan Review <br />Fire Sprinkler Drawings <br />Courthouse Square <br />Project No. 9828 <br />Dear Billy: <br />At a Developmerrt Team meeting. November 5,1998~ Olive~ Raab of Interface Engineet~ng was present to <br />review the recommendation preserrted bY Mer~9 Assodates~ value engineering repo~t. At the end of the <br />preserrtatio~, he infonned the Development Team of an informai conversation involving Nathan Brown, <br />Building Ofricia~ for'the C'ity of Salem. We have become awa~e that the City no longer acoepts plan review <br />submissions without fire sprinkler drawings. Unfortunately, our services and fees were based on produdng <br />a performance specification i~stead of fuily developed fire sprinkle~ design drawings. <br />V1le have determined that instead of a perfotmance spec~fication as originaily irrtended, the City will accept <br />the followi~g process: <br />1. Permft OocumeMs will indicate the foilowing: <br />a. Perfonnanoe ~~s indic~tln9 design criteria, mate~ials~ appiicable <br />oodes, and Mstallation~techniques (cumeMly indudecQ. ~ . - <br />b. Fire sprinkle~ water servloe, backflow. end ~fir'e departmerrt oonnedions <br />(cumentiy include~. <br />c. Riser locations and dlagrams (not cumeMly indude~. <br />d. Main pipU'~9 r'outes and sizes (not cumently indudec~. <br />2. Corrtrador submittal doc:umer~ts: <br />a. Hydraulic calculations. <br />b. Branch pipin9 IaYout and sizes. <br />c. Head spacing and locations. <br />d. Mat~~al ~ubmittals. <br />We aoe offering to provide the add'dional design and documentation for the sprinkler system for a lump sum <br />fee as foilows: <br />Irrterface Enginee~in9: ~~~ <br />Arbuckle Costic Archit~ec~s: ______ <br />Total ~~~~ <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.