My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Interim Architect Agreement/Contract
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Interim Architect Agreement/Contract
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 11:47:23 AM
Creation date
8/2/2011 11:15:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10061
Title
Interim Architect Agreement/Contract
Company
Arbuckle/Costic
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Contracts - Agreements
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dan cautioned us not to enter into the architectural contract until we were explicit in the scope of <br />services to be perfonned and the commensurate fee. I told him that our attomey's were dealing with <br />Arbuckle Costic only on the legal language and provisions for dispute settlement, and FTA regulations <br />and that the compensation issue (including the scope of services to be performed) were being held for <br />Randy and I to deal with. I suggested that Dan and Craig should meet with Randy and I on that <br />specific issue when the balance of the contract and the data requested from Alan Costic are <br />ava~lable. <br />Dan also suggested that they review the contract with Pence Kelley to make sure that the scope of <br />work dovetails with the architects, as well as make suggestions to us relative to compensation. I told <br />him I thought that was a good idea. : - ~~ 4_;. <br />Dan suggested that it would be money well-spent to retain an estimating company to prepare a <br />separate estimate on the project as a second opinion and to check that PK has not missed some <br />component of the project. I suggested that we need to have a discussion of that with Randy. <br />~~ " I have noted in review of these invoices that they are no <br />better documented than the current ones and, therefore, Dan should request the necessary <br />supporting data on them as well. <br />• Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.