My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Cost Consultants
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Cost Consultants
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:00:50 AM
Creation date
8/2/2011 3:35:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10066
Title
Cost Consultants
Company
Gardiner & Clancy LLC
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Design - Planning
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In the early stages of this project it was assumed that the inclusion of a private <br />developer would be an added resource to the project. We envision private retail on the <br />ground floor and private office space being leased on the upper floors. The leased <br />office space will allow the county to acquire additional space over the next 10-15 years. <br />With this background the county desires to achieve the following objectives: <br />• Construct 100,000+ gsf of new office space <br />~ Acquire ownership of our portion of the complex in 20-30 years <br />• Build and own a 350+ parking structure as part of the project <br />• Leverage the value of our property together with federal funds and the resources of <br />a private developer to minimize the cost of this project. <br />• Pay full service rents (O&M and debt service included) for county office space in <br />9999 in the $1.20-1.40 /sq ft/ month range. <br />In order to achieve the objectives noted above, the county must first determined that it <br />is financially feasible to participate in this project. While we must find replacement <br />office space for some of our departments and provide for future growth, the lack of new <br />bonding authority and potential property tax limitations make this type of venture very <br />risky. The county's general fund as well as other funds may have great difficutty <br />absorbing the additional cost of ti~is new office space The county currently pays <br />$.82-1.15 / sq ft/ mo. for existing office space. <br />Therefore, we are seeking the assistance of outside fnanc9al advisors to analyzed <br />financing options as well as review the proposals submitted by Mr Berrey. The Board <br />of Commissioners will not enter into a final contact until they can be assured that the <br />counry has a sound financial strategy for building and occupying this facility. <br />Time Frames; <br />The developer is currently out of town and will not be submitting new proposals until <br />July 26th. However, the transit district must proceed with preliminary architectural and <br />funding plans in order to obtain final approval of the FTA funds. Their submission <br />deadline is August 30th. Unfortunately, if the county badcs out of the project, the site <br />and design would both change. My goal is to complete the review of the developers <br />proposals and develop a clear financial strategy by August 9, 1996 so that transit's <br />project and funding are not jeopardized. <br />Options: <br />There appears to be at least three basic options for the county to consider. However, <br />all three are highly dependent on finances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.