My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FACILITY STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING <br />J~T(JARY 2 3, 19 9 5 <br />`4~ <br />\ <br />PRESENT: Ken Sherman, Valerie Vollmar, Lydia Buchanan, Mike <br />Murray, Jack Munro, Fritz Skirvin, Mark Caillier, Ralph <br />Grim, Dale Penn, Ruth Johnson, David Glennie, Ken <br />Roudybush, Ann Gavin-Sample, Larry Oglesby, Starr <br />Garland, Bob Royer, Randy Curtis, Bob McCune <br />GUESTS: Ed Cavaille, Jerry Frost, Jim Murchinson, Paul Lipscomb <br />MINUTES: The minutes where approved with the following change: <br />Dog Control was approved to purchase the smallest <br />amount of land possible. <br />COURTS RECOMMENDATION: <br />It was moved and seconded that Courts is an "A" catego- <br />ry. Courts should continue to occupy the Courthouse. <br />Non-court functions should be relocated to other facil- <br />ities. The committee recommended this be done in two <br />phases. Phase I would give priority to court security <br />and security related space needs. Phase II would add <br />new courtrooms and related support space as needed. <br />The committee also recommended that a consultant be <br />hired to evaluate the Courthouse and develop a remodel- <br />ing master plan. <br />Vote was unanimous with all members voting yes to the <br />recommendation. <br />DOWNTOWN RECOMMENDATION: <br />The committee was not willing to make a motion at this <br />time. There were several questions raised: Do all <br />departments need to be in the same building? Would <br />remodeling downtown buildings give enough space to <br />house all departments or would it be more cost effec- <br />tive to build a new building? What is the status on <br />downtown parking and Transit Mall? City responded <br />"They have not made any commitments at this time." <br />Ken Sherman has made inquires into the Equitable build- <br />ing. It is possible that this building could be avail- <br />able and could house all departments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.