My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Courts and Court Security <br />Recommendation: The Courts should continue to occupy the Courthouse with the <br />understanding that the space available is adequate to meet the <br />Courts current and future needs. Non-court functions should be <br />relocated to other facilities. Phase I of the remodeling should give <br />priority to court security and security related space needs. Phase <br />II would add new courtrooms and related support space as needed. <br />The committee also recommends that a consultant be hired to <br />evaluate the Courthouse and develop a remodelin~ master plan. <br />Priority: The Committee assigned this project an "A" priority for security <br />related issues and a"B" priority for new or remodeled Court <br />facilities. <br />Cost Factors: The cost of the this project is estimated at 3.1 million dollars. The <br />consultant's master plan may identify new costs not considered in <br />previous estimates. <br />Options Considered: The Committee considered a proposal to construct a new Justice <br />Center on the Senator Block. This proposal was slightly more <br />costly (2.3 million). The committee did not feel it was appropriate <br />to abandon the Courthouse and convert to County office space. <br />The Courts were also asked to consider the use of video <br />technology and "double shifting" of court operations. <br />Risks and <br />Liabilities: Some members of the committee feel that the public will be more <br />supportive of a bond measure if new building construction is tied <br />~ to criminal justice programs rather than the growth of general <br />government. The consultant's study may reveal that the <br />Courthouse does not have adequate space to accominodate future <br />Court needs. It is also possible that the new facilities needed to <br />accommodate the relocation of County offices will not be funded <br />in order to permit the timely expansion of the Courts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.