Laserfiche WebLink
: 1 . <br />Marion County Facilities Master Plan <br />5.0 Alteraative Staff and Space Requirements Projections <br />.~ <br />~ <br />T'he department projected staff requirements addressed in Section 3.0 are reported on the Staff - <br />and Space Requirements Detail Sheets in Appendix A for each position by department and <br />function. As previously mentioned, the departments have assumed a greater demand for services ~ <br />due to faster growth than projected by the MWVCOG. <br />To compare the department's staff requirements projections to the MWVCOG projection levels, <br />three altemative projections were developed as shown in the calculations provided in Exhibit 5. - <br />The department staff projections, per the Detail Sheets in Appendix A, are listed as "Projection _ <br />A" in Exhibit 5, increasing from 787 staff in 1993 to 1,099 staff in 2013. Summarizing the net, <br />usable space required of each department based on the detailed space analysis, a total of 238,661 ' <br />NSF are required in 1993 -- increasing to 309,725 NSF in 2013. . <br />The department staff projections suggest a slightly faster rate of staff growth than total - <br />population growth when compared to the MWVCOG population estimates. A ratio of 3.26' _ <br />staff per 1,000 population increases gradually tb 3.58 staff per 1,000 population by 2013. <br />"Projection B" assumes that the current 3.26 staff per 1,0~0 population ratio is maintained <br />throughout the projection period, resulting in growth to 999 staff by 2013 (100 fewer staff than _ . <br />projected by the departments). If one assumed the same ratio of staff ro space required _ <br />(indicated as the "adjusted net area factor"), a toral of 281,621 net square feet would be required <br />by 2013 -- 28,104 NSF less than Projection A. This is roughly equal to the total amount of - <br />space on the first floor level of the Courthouse. _ <br />"Projection C" and "Projection D" assume that the current ratio of staff to population remain - <br />constant through 2013; however Projection C assumes that the population grow at an average _ <br />annual rate of 2.00% compounded (versus the MWVCOG projections of 1.20% over the 1992- <br />2013 term). Projection D assumes a population increase of 2.25% average annual growth - <br />through 2013. Projecaon C results in a total of 1,169 staff (70 staff more than projected by the _ <br />departments) and 329,577 NSF (19,852 NSF higher than Projection A.) <br />~ T'6e cucrent year (1993) population is acmally listed at 241,500 to reFlut the end of year 1992 population; <br />nearer the estimated popula~ion for the 'currznt' year. ' <br />Page 10 _ <br />