My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
subdivision, that the courthouse be remodeled for non-court department and agency use and <br />that a new Justice Center be built for the courts, would necessitate continued use of the <br />Franklin Building and probably the Ticor Building to meet the projected space needs for <br />non-court downtown departments and agencies. Under that arrangement, these departments <br />and agencies would continue to be physically separated from one another. <br />B. COST FACTORS <br />1. Preliminary cost studies indicate that the Equitable Building can be purchased <br />and remodeled at a cost of $9.6 to $11.6 million. This option is about $8 to $10 million less <br />than constructing a new Public Service Building and at least $5 million less than a downsized <br />(Phase I) Public Service Building. <br />2. The acquisition of the Equitable Building would permit the county to sell the <br />Franklin and Senator properties; and the construction of a new Public Service Building on <br />the Senator site would permit the sale of the Franklin Building. <br />3. It may also be possible to use certificates of participation (COP) to acquire <br />the building. <br />C. OPTIONS CONSIDERED <br />1. The committee consider six options, four of which require the construction of <br />a new or downsized Public Service Building. <br />2. One option, which proved the less desirable, was the retention and remodeling <br />of the four existing downtown buildings. The downtown buildings do not contain sufficient <br />office and parking space to meet future needs and the Senator Building is in need of <br />extensive repairs within the next five years. Furthermore, the cost of this. option could be <br />nearly as high as the purchase of the Equitable Building. <br />PAGE 2 <br />ks j/cd/Down town. 03/ 10/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.