My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
department and municipal court; Marion County's sheriffs .,office; and the Oregon State <br />Police Salem patrol office, ID bureau, regional dispatch; and the corrections administrative, <br />parole and probation units. <br />2. It is also recommended that a studv be conducted to determine whether <br />additional ef6ciencies can be realized by combining the law enforcement and jail campus. <br />C. COST FACTORS <br />1. The estimated cost for this facility is ~30 million. This cost includes land and <br />systems development charges, a portion of which should be allocated to the jail expansion. <br />2. Further study is necessary to determine the best way to share the construction <br />and operating costs of the joint facility. This facility would serve the law enforcement needs <br />of all residents of Marion County and the City of Salem, including those Salem residents who <br />live in Polk Counry and do not pay taxes to Marion County. An equitable arrangement must <br />be worked out under which all benefitted residents ~vould bear a fair share of the burden <br />in constructing this facility. <br />D. OPTIONS CONSIDERED <br />1. Each agency could build or lease its own facilitv. <br />2. The committee also considered whether this facility should be funded <br />immediately or delayed until other ro'ects are funded. It does not appear feasible to phase <br />in the construction of this facility over several years. <br />E. RISKS AiYD LIABILITIES <br />1. If additional space is not provided for the sheriff's office, there is not adequate <br />room in the courthouse for court expansion. <br />2. Failure to develop the Tri-Agency facility would also adversely impact the <br />PAGE 14 <br />ksj/cd/Facilities.Int 03/18/'95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.