My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />years if that proves to be the most cost effective altemative foi meeting the space needs of <br />the non-court downtown departments and agencies and if the purchase can be financed <br />through certificates of participation. If a bond measure is needed to finance this purchase, <br />it should not be submitted to the voters unril after the funding for the projects descnbed in <br />paragraphs 1 through 6 has been secured. Similarly, if the purchase of the Equitable <br />Building proves not to be the most cost effective alternative for meeting the space needs of <br />the downtown facilities, the submission to the voters of any bond measure to construct a new <br />downtown Public Service building should not take place until financing has been secured for <br />the development of the public safety and health facilities and the remodeling of the <br />courthouse to serve the needs of the courts. <br />9. The county should proceed within the next two to three years to execute <br />Phase I of the courthouse remodel, responding to the securities concerns and the need for <br />adequate jury assembly space. It may be appropriate to build the costs of Phase I into the <br />county's public safety and health bond measure referred to above. Subsequent phases of <br />the court's project, involving the creation of additional courts and related spaces, should be <br />undertaken on an incremental basis as the need arises. <br />10. The new dog control office is small enough in size and cost that the county <br />mav be able to add this prpiect on to one of the other elements of the master <br />implementation without major difficultv. Implementation of the recommendation on dog <br />control may also need to await resolution of issues concerning operational direction and <br />funding. However, if Marion County is to continue its dog control activity, it will be able to <br />do so with maximum efficiency only when it is moved to a new, adequate permanent home <br />in ciose proximity to the new Humane Society facilitv. <br />11. In implementinQ its master facilities plan, and specificallv in seekin~fundin~ <br />PAGE 32 <br />U~;i~rt/Fac-iliries_int 03/1R~95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.