Laserfiche WebLink
The Judges of the Circuit and District Courts have considered the option of <br />decentralization, as a means of minimizing the need for space in the Courthouse. This <br />would require subject matter specialization, and additional space demands at remote <br />sites. Operational costs also increase with decentralization. Based upon a discussion <br />and reviev~ of the advantages and disadvantages of decentralization, the Sub- <br />` Committee agrees with the unanimous position of the Circuit and District Court Judges <br />that centralization of facilities and support operations allows the greatest flexibility for <br />the Bench, is more procedurally and cost-efficient, and is clearly preferred. <br />ADDITIONAL NEEDS <br />Additional needs of the Courts were identified, including a substantial number of <br />additional attorney conference rooms, witness waiting areas, law enforcement waiting <br />areas, mediation and arbitration hearing rooms, and similar non-courtroom space. The <br />other primary area of concern is the jury assembly room. The present jury assembly <br />facility is located on the 2nd floor of the Marion County Courthouse and has a seating <br />capacity of 49, based upon fire marshall regulations. The average jury panel is in <br />excess of 150. On most days, the number of jurors required to report to the courthouse <br />exceeds the stated capacity of 49. Further, the location of the jury assembly room <br />places an additional and often unnecessary burden on the courthouse elevator system, <br />and exposes potential jurors to inadvertent contact with lawyers, litigants, criminal <br />defendants, police o~cers and others with whom the jurors should have no contact <br />outside of the courtroom. <br />SECURITY <br />The Committee was also charged with the responsibility of assessing security issues, <br />and upon its review found many significant areas of concern. The Committee noted <br />that more than 50 separate security reports were filed by the Marion County Courts with <br />the Oregon Judicial Department, involving incidents ranging from weapons violations <br />to physical assaults to threats of the lives of Judges, lawyers, litigants and jurors, to <br />reported bombs on the premises. While it was noted that the Marion County Sheriffs <br />O~ce provides as much security as presently possible and responds promptly and <br />efficiently to requests for assistance, it was nevertheless noted that security is woefully <br />inadequate on all court premises. <br />Beginning with 1994, a Security Assessment was created by the Oregon State <br />Legislature within each County. The Fund receives money from assessments in <br />criminal cases and is to be spent to enhance security in courthouses and court facilities <br />in the counties where the revenue is generated. Based upon the revenue to be <br />generated in this dedicated fund, piecemeal security enhancements will be possible in <br />the years ahead. It was noted, however, that only limited security improvements will <br />be funded based upon the size of this account. Also, the primary cost of enhanced <br />security is staffing, due to the nature .of the present courthouse. The courthouse <br />-3- <br />