My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Demolition/Abatement Constracts (Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Demolition/Abatement Constracts (Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:19:28 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 10:26:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10111
Title
Demolition/Abatement Constracts (Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4: Mcthods of Sclcction <br />http:/~wwu~.fta.dot.go~'!fta%libran admin~f3PPman/sect_40.htm <br />'(which can also be included in your amendment if you do not use a form): <br />• Identify the solicitation number of the original solicitation; <br />' Identify the amendment number; <br />' Identify the contact person and phone number within your department for further information; <br />• Indicate whether or not the time and date specified in the original solicitation is changed as a result <br />of the amendment; <br />• Advise offerors of the need to and how they should acknowledge receipt of the amendment; <br />• Advise offerors what the changes are; and <br />' Have the amendment signed by the appropriate procurement official, most frequently the <br />contracting officer. <br />Amendments are typically sent to every firm that has been furnished the original solicitation (the IFB or <br />RFP). Once the solicitation has been issued, using the mailing list to ensure that any solicitation <br />amendments are furnished to all entities that received the original solicitation is important, as discussed in <br />Section 4.3.2.2, "Solicitation Mailing_List." This is an obvious issue, but some agencies don't realize there <br />is a problem until bids are received that do not acknowledge a material amendment. You then declare the <br />bidder non-responsive. Some agencies include clauses in solicitations making it the offeror's responsibility <br />to obtain addenda. While this may assist in overcoming a protest from a bidder held non-responsive, it <br />will not necessarily transform the bid into a responsive or acceptable one. <br />You cannot over-emphasize the admitistrative importance of furnishing amendments to all entities who <br />received the original solicitation. It is important to have a single point af contact within your organization <br />responsible for issuing solicitations and addenda. Some agencies post a notice at the receipt of offers of <br />the addenda that have been issued. While there is little an offeror can do other than hold back the offer at <br />that point, the offeror may be able to perfect the acknowledgment of addenda and live with the rest of the <br />offer as prepared without the addendum. <br />One of the critical issues when issuing an amendment is whether or not to extend the time and date for <br />receipt of offers. You should consider the impact of the changes you are making in light of the time it will <br />take a prudent offeror to incorporate those changes. This includes the time impact on the work already <br />done in preparing the bid or proposal. The impact could be minimal or very significant and there is no <br />"cookie cutter" answer to how much additional time, if any, should be allowed -- you want to allow <br />sufficient time for the changes to be considered in a meaningful manner. <br />One "warning" : this may be the first time in the solicitation process you run into the schedule your <br />internal customer has established. Your-in5tincts may say that the time and date set for receipt should be <br />extended but your customer may say ttte change is negligible and no time is warranted. Early planning and <br />communication with your customer may build in some time for changes like this. If not, the consequences <br />may be fewer competitors, a protest, pricing that includes unnecessary contingencies, or post-award <br />discovery of specification conflicts that require compensation for changes. <br />If a decision is made to amend the solicitation with bids due in two days, consider notifying prospective <br />offerors by telephone, FAX, or telegram of the new date and time and follow that notification up with an <br />amendment to the solicitation. If you have already received offers in your bid room, it is recommended <br />i of4~ O1/10/97 13:0935 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.