Laserfiche WebLink
• Price <br />• Demolition time schedule <br />• Qualifications <br />~ Recycling <br />After review of the demolition proposals, the two low proposers were asked to <br />clarify their costs with respect to 70, 80 and 90% recycling efforts. In order to <br />provide adequate time for contractors and staff to review recycling proposals, the <br />contract award a.nd startup date was delayed. Base on the analysis of the new <br />information, submitted by both contractors, the review team believes it is in the <br />county's interest to encourage a 90% recycling program. <br />The contract was scheduled to be awarded on Aprii 16, 1997. However, an objection <br />was filed by Northwest Demolition & Dismantling questioning the fairness of the <br />review/selection process. The awazd was delayed one week in order to give the <br />affected contractors and staff attomeys time to evaluate the selection process. At <br />issue, was the request by the owner's agent, Mr. Dan Berrey, to have the two <br />finalists submit additional information on their recycling plans. <br />Sta.ff attorneys have concluded that the RFP process gives the owners flexibility to <br />review and clarify contract proposals. Both finalists were given the same amended <br />requests regarding recycling plans and both fmalists took advantage of changes in <br />specifications and the startup date to submit new cost proposals. It appears from the <br />aznended proposals that both contractors benefitted from our request for additional <br />information. <br />Informafion contained in the proposals regarding recycling efforts were not detailed <br />enough to allow for a complete analysis. The two finalists were contacted, asked <br />questions regarding their proposals and subsequently requested to submit additional <br />information related to recycling and starlup dates. Should there be a continued <br />challenge to the contract award on the basis of the modified recycling plan, the <br />county has the option to award the contract on the basis on the original "base <br />proposal amount" only. Since further delays would have a substantial impact on the <br />project schedule, this option represents a viable alternative even though recycling <br />efforts would be reduced. <br />Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the review committee that the <br />contract for demolition of the Senator Block be awarded to Staton Construction of <br />Eugene Oregon. Staton's base cost proposal was for $547,489. The proposal at the <br />90% recycling level is $518,579. <br />