Laserfiche WebLink
ent bX: STATON CONSTRUCTION 1 541 461 0545; 05/05/97 11:56AM;~X #93~;Page 213 <br />product sales, dimension~l lumber res~le, interiar archit~ctura! finish materiaf <br />sales and mechanical, ele~trical and plumbing ccmpanent sales. <br />Staton has agreed thr~ugh previous communicatiQn to Marion County to <br />n~gotiate with Marion County ort the matter of additional re~~+cling with the <br />intent to reduce the cosi af the project ta bQth Statan and Marivn County. <br />Staton is ar~xious e~~~! willing to support thes~ negotia~ions with the <br />unders~~nding th~t it will be mutually benefi~i~l to both parties, Negotiatians <br />k~ for ~dditional recyoling cred'sts w+ll occur un~iBr the following condition$: <br />~~S'' - 1.y Additional recycling credits ahave ~75,000•44 for this project witl be split <br />°~~ an a 50150 basis between Statan and Marion County. Ths split will occur <br />~y ~~ ~" aft~r Staton management, ramoval and transportation costs have been <br />~ r~ deducted fram the additicnal recycling revenue. Management, rema~al and <br />~ transportation costs wili be b~sed on the St2~ton 1~$7 Rental Rate Sh~~t <br />L which is ~ttached, and/or direct involce costs far ~ub cantracted work, <br />( arion County must tlemonstrate ti~2~t the additiona~) recycling re~enue <br />. .- <br />~ as been generated as a direct result of Marion County ingenuity or <br />resaurces, and that the revenue was not included in the original Staton <br />proposal. <br />,~ 3. r4dd-tional recycling proposals submitt~d by Marlon County may not <br />~ersel im act Stiatan's work sche~ule or project cQsts. <br />Y P <br />v ~~~~.~/AI1 recycling rever~u~s to be split by Staton and Marion County must bE <br />~'greed upon in advance and execut~d via written ~antract change arder. <br />_, 5.) Dem~lition lndustry standard for d~termining demalition recycling <br />percentages is based on truck load count by vclume, or weight by known <br />valumetriclweight conversions. Marion Count~t has elected to ~chieve a 90% <br />rec~rcling goal by weight. Statvn's prQposal for recycling percentag~S is <br />based an known volumetriclweight conversions for demolition. Weighing <br />e~~h load transported off site wes not required by the 6id specifi~~tion nar <br />provided f~r in the Statdn proposai. C~sts for verification of reeycli~g <br />perc~r~t~ges by weight, via scale measurement, sh~ll be the respansibility of <br />Marion C~unty. <br />ITENI 24.3 P~MA~TY: The assessment of monetary pen~ities for failure to <br />achiev~ the ~d°~'o recycling goat were not included in the bid specificaE'ran and <br />shal! not be included in th~ contract. <br />2 <br />