My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Consultation Report (2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Consultation Report (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2014 11:29:07 AM
Creation date
8/17/2011 10:57:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10325
Title
Consultation Report
Company
Palmer Grouth& Pietrka
BLDG Date
2/13/1998
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Design - Planning
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CONSULTATION (continued) <br />stream over the 26-year period. The alternative to using the lower discount rate would be <br />to build in a gmwth rate of 3 to 4 percent, which would indicate an appropriate discount rate <br />at the mid-point of 10.5 to 11.5 percent. Either technique results in the same present value <br />conclusion. This discount range is generally supported by local and national information <br />regarding discount rates appropriate for office buildings. The mid point of the discount <br />range or 7.5 percent (market oriented) and 6.34 percent (project oriented) will be presenteri. <br />The actual calculation of the present value of the income stream versus the build analysis is <br />summarized on the following chart. <br />TECHIVIQUE ONE - LEASE VS. BUII.,DING COST ANALYSIS <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />:::::..:::::.:.:::::....:::::.~.::..._.::........:................................... <br />...................... .. ................ ....................... ............... <br />......................:.. :.................n......................:...............:: <br />:.::::.~ :::::::::::::::::.~:::::::::::::::::::::::.~:::::::::::::::::::::: •.~:: :.:.~.: <br />:•: :w: :v :::::::::::::::::.~:::n~:::::::n_:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~.~.::~:.~ <br />.........................................................................: ........... <br />.................w::::: .................w.~::: .......n.:::::: ....y::.: :::: :v~::: <br />................. ................ .... v: .... ~ ...... <br />...............w::: ~:::. ........... ......:....:: :.:..... w.~::::iit <br />..~:::::::::::n.......::iii...... ...... <br /> <br /> <br />..............:. <br /> <br />:::::::.~:::..:v:. <br />~:.::i'+•?:v::::... <br />::. w: <br />... ..... <br />dif\9 <br />~.~`~::::i'~:%~':~~:}i~f~:~v~i(:i:iT$?i'~ii:i::i?^.`~$rri~i:?i(~:~~~ <br />{{: . <br />..:~ . :. . ~!C#~1M~ <br />~ <br />ii?i"~~ii:i??iii:`~"''i:: <br />iiii::iii::(;: <br />:::?Y +i:•~i::Y:~ }i:•ii:•i:~ <br />Income Stream (Lease Scenario)-- <br />Office Lease Income: 114,557 SF a$1.47/SF = $168,399 <br />Parking Lease Income: 277 Spaces z$47.22/Space = 13.080 <br />Total Monthly Income $181,479 <br />Present Value Analysis- <br />Monthly Income Stream: z Present Value of One per Period* = Present Value <br />~181,479 a 137.9544 (7.59b) _ $25,035,827 <br />Cost per Square Foot $218.54/SF <br />$181,479 z 153.5146 (6.34~0) _ $27,859,676 <br />Cost per Square Foot $243.19/SF <br /> <br /> <br />»»;;;;::.>:.>:;:>::;:.»:.>:<:>;::>;»»::>::;;;;;: :.:::::.>:.;:.;;::.;;:>:::;::;:.;:.;:.;:.;:;.>:::.:.>~. <br />>::»::»::»<>:<:><::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::<::::»::»»<::><>::::<:<:<::>::::»>::>:<:»:<::<:::>::>:«:>::>:::« <br />»:««<:»>::::>:::;:.;:.::>~;>::<:::»>::;»:<::~;;:>::>:;:::::>::<;<::;:>~;:::>::»»»>:;:.;:.»:»»»>: <br />::::::::::::;::::;:.;;:::.> :.:::::::::::. .;:.;:::::.. ~::;:::::::.;::.;:.;:.;:.;:<::<::>:::.;::.;:.;:.: <br />: :.::::::::::::::::::::::::::. .::::::::::. ~::::. :. ~:::::::::..::::::::::: :.:::::. : <br /> <br />;~:>:.>;;:.:;;;:.>;>:.;;;:.;;;:;.>:;:;:.;;: <br /><: ~;::>::::::.~:::.;:;.;~: ~:::«::: ::: <br />;>~::»::>::;~:::::>':::::>:>:::;:`:;;:>:::<::';:;:~`<~:::»::>~'`:~':?::»:::::::>~::>~ ~<>:::>':::< <br />;::: . . ~1 Y ..:..:::. « <: ts .................................... ..... <br />.;:Bt~... d.. . .?~. ~. ............................................::::::. _::...... <br />::::::::: :.:::::.~::::::::::::::....;..::: ~:::::::::::::::::::. . _::::::::::::. ~:.:: :,::.::::::::: . ~::>:>`:::::~~:>::>:`:'~<`:;::;::~~:;;;:»>:: <br />~<:~::... <br /> <br /> <br />........................:........... <br />....... ..................:::::: :.. <br />:::::::::.::::::: :.. ~::::::.......... <br />Total Building Cost 530,670,149 <br />Less: Transit Grants ~9~g~.~) <br />Total Building Cost - Marion County $20,826,149 = $181.80/SF <br />* Beginning of Period Payments for 26 years <br />Techniq~.~e Two Market Rent Versus Scheduled Rent/Ownership nalysis--The second <br />technique will compare the previously concluded present value of the market rent income <br />stream as presented in technique one with the proposed scheduled contract rentlownership <br />scenario proposed by the Melvin Mark Development Company. In this case the scheduled <br />contract rent is $1.30 per square foot for the office space plus $40 per parldng space. These <br />rates will be discounted to present value and will be adjusted for the reversion at the end of <br />the 26-year period. The reversionary value will be the value of the building plus the land. <br />c9sos2 12 <br />PALMER, GROTH & PIETKA, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.