My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Financial- COPS (Issuance)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Financial- COPS (Issuance)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 2:26:27 PM
Creation date
8/23/2011 10:52:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10160
Title
Financial- COPS (Issuance)
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Finance
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Marion Count Facilities Master Plan <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Over the next twenty years the needs for services provided by Marion County are <br />going to increase. As this report has indicated some departments currently are over <br />utilized or are in space conditions which are not allowing for efficient staff and public <br />utilization. As the population continueand ~e cies to mod fy and/orlexpand o~meet <br />services will require these departments g <br />these projected needs. <br />Major impact in the growth of the County services is the Courts, Mental Health, and <br />Adult/Juvenile Corrections. These areas generally will require the majority of the <br />space needs in the future. <br />It is the Consultants recommendations that PLAN B be selected. VV'ith proper <br />implementation, this plan will meet all established planning criteria and objectives. It <br />will create a centralized focus of County government that is represented in the <br />downtown core. It will maintain the Courthouse for court functions to continue and <br />expartd civil and criminal court administration. Although this plan will result in major <br />capital expenses, it is not significantly more costly than PLAN C. The lease <br />arraingment described in PI-AN A would give County less control over its future and <br />result in less than efficient operations. <br />The implementation of PLAN B should be coordinated with the City/County/State <br />Tri-Agency Law Enforcement Project. The following is a partial list of benefits that <br />will be derived by implementing PLAN B: <br />• CENTRALIZED COUNTY GOVERNMENT <br />• EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF SPACE <br />• ENERGY/COST EFFICIENI' FACILITIES <br />• GREATER STAFF EFFICIENCY <br />• EFFICIEN'T UTII-IZATION OF TAX DOLLARS <br />Page 152 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.