Laserfiche WebLink
02/06/98 FRI 16:45 FAX 503 223 4606 __ MELVIN MARK COMPANIES ~ 003 <br />• CONIMENTS REGARDING THE "COMBINED BUDGET STATUS SUMMARY" <br />Melvin Mark Development Company <br />CJ <br />Architectural Enmineering Fees <br />Arbuclcle Costic (a) OK <br />Other (b) We shonld l~ave something budgeted in this line item If a <br />commissioning agent is employed, it will probably nm bdtwe~n <br />$50,000 and ~80,000. I did include other consnlta~s in ~-y budget <br />(e.g. si~age, other consultants). This wonld be a good pllace to carry <br />these allowances. <br />Proiect Mana~ement <br />Melvin Mark (c) OK <br />Pence Kelly (d) OK <br />Contractor Fees (e} Bond, Fees and Insurance should not be separated from ¢ontractor <br />budgets. As these fees will increase in relation to other l~ard costs, it is <br />safer to leave these associated costs within the contractot's budget. <br />Dan Beirey (fl OK <br />Administration ri~~, ~e ~ ~,e <br />L,egal - Couuty (g) This amount is $25,000 more than o budgeted• <br />to increase this line item in the next draft_ <br />Legal - Tiansit (h) We understood th,at this line item was carried in an inte~al Transit <br />budget and would not be included as part of the total p ect budget- If <br />this is not the case, we will have to add this to thc total~roject budget <br />140 Fund - County (i) OK <br />Other Administration (j) This cost is not included in our latest moiiel. ff Wis is t~ be included, <br />we will have to add this to the total pro}ect badget. <br />propettv Acauisition <br />Block (k) <br />Transit purchase from County (1) <br />Final Appraisal (m) <br />Demolition and Remediation <br />Demalition {n) <br />OK <br />As we have been projecting costs as total costs, and no~ necessarily <br />allocating costs between Transit and the Couniy, we ~nld collectivelp <br />examine how this affects the sources and uses of pro~ costs. <br />OK <br />OK <br />• Remediation (o) OK <br />