Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)

Home Browse Search

negotiations. Chevron wants to delineate first, then proceed. Chevron will be treated as a separate entity. We can still meet timelines and timeframes if we go with delineation and then ~ remediation. If the issue is not resotved and we are ready to ezcavate, what happens? Kathleen met with Dave and his design intent is to come on to the site on the east side of the parcel at the Beri parking and south on Chevron and then move across the other side. Putting together the delineation first, then work on hot spot remediation heading north would be minimal impact on Dave's plan. We would be in and out in 3 weeks time. Basically we would do two phases at the same time? Last week we talked about Staton taking it all out now. That is correct, the goal at this point would be to be prepared to start hot spot remediation on August 11`~ and take about 3 weeks. All the hot spots, everything but Chevron, with the north of the Liu building being the starting point. We would do the Chevron delineation fust, do the rest of the clean up and then come back to Chevron. We are looking at 2 days of delineation, 5 days for chemical analysis, maybe 2 weeks total. Goal is 3-4 weeks for the remediation portion and if we can, accomplish in 3 weeks to accommodate Dave's move on to the site. Dave has this time on the schedule. We have soil observation planned for this phase We would be overlapping tasks just a bit. Dave wants to start on Chevron with ramp site first. Are you ezcavating more than one site at a time? That was not the way Dave looked at it. Ramp out of site on to Church Street side for trucks? Trucks will be going out on High. Concerns were expressed to consider minimizing high volume traffic activity on High Street ~ because of the neighboring businesses. If you use Church for trucks, the Statesman Journal is the only business on that side and the impact would not be as great. The plans go out to the curb line, wiil you ezcavate to curb line and then come back to shore? Shoring has its own lead time and the tasks can overlap. Parking Randy, R.G. and Leonard met with the city staff on Tuesday. It will be Friday before they get an answer on the revocable permits. Our reception was fairly good. This is an issue that hadn't been done in Salem for a long time. However, the Mayor expressed support after the meeting. R.G. noted that there currently are other revocable permits in Salem. Transit has current ones in place. If we receive a negative response from the city, we will need to follow up with 2nd meeting. The city is dealing with a concept with unknown implications involved, and are afraid of the precedent it may set in giving up additional right of way. The Franklin building is currently under the sidewalk now, but it was done on an older permit. Leonard stated we need affirmative direction from the city on this portion to make a decision on P 1 option. Mike looked at P 1 option with moving sheer walls and what could be done; and if the sheer walls have to stay where they are, what would you have to do to accommodate them. The only solution to moving the sheer walls, would be to eliminate them and go with a rigid frame at a cost of $2.5 per square foot, and design time would double. The problem with moving them to fit the parking structure caused problems for the building above. Dave is ~ cunently showing big sheer wall footings at a high cost per Mike's current plan. Going with a rigid frame may not be all that bad of an idea. Page 2 of 9