My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:47:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10302
Title
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
BLDG Date
8/19/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. l <br />• f <br />~ Courthouse Square Design Team Meeting <br />February 13,1997 <br />Present: Randy Curtis, RG Andersen-Wyckoff, Leonard Lodder, John Whit~ington, Rachel <br />Sheskey, Dan Berrey, Curt Pence, Clarence Pugh, Paul Young ~, <br />Agenda: Updates <br />Atrium Design ' <br />Parking structure, 2nd level ' <br />Sth floor '' <br />ITEM 1: Updates <br />Dan opened the meeting with information on the meeting he had with the tenants <br />block. He will have his recommendation by next Tuesday (2/18). He will meet <br />Tuesday or Wednesday. <br />Streetscape <br />Randy asked for discussion on the streetscape proposal that he and RG will be present <br />at the monthly city/county meeting on 2/18. Curt reported that he would not have the <br />until Monday, but the engineer said it would not exceed $SOk. Randy explained tr <br />asked for details on how we are going to spend the $2mi1. in urban renewal money. ' <br />~ opportunity to present the numbers and get information to prepare for the full coun <br />be held within next few weeks. The numbers may be higher than they expect. RG p <br />the meeting on 2/18 is not an open meeting, but will be to give the council an update <br />Randy said we will request that someone on the council initiate a vacation proces: <br />Assuming that this is met with favorable support, Randy will follow up with a letter <br />detailing the process. It was pointed out that it is not necessary to have the alley vac~ <br />begin demolition. <br />Curt distributed the summary of streetscape costs (see attached). He explained that <br />presented before was just for the concrete and pavers. RG asked if this list is equal <br />other streetscape work done in the downtown area. Curt explained that this is witY <br />which the city may not approve. Most of the recent design has been 10% pavers, <br />This is based on renovations, not new site design. There was discussion around th <br />city has been having with the pavers in other areas; maintenance issues, ice, a nicer lc <br />easy repairs. Randy asked how much of this work moves into the plaza. Curt res~ <br />100%. The only items not included on this list are the breezeway and drive throu <br />n the Senator <br />ith Randy on <br />ig to city staff <br />;xact numbers <br />it the city has <br />his will be an <br />il meeting, to <br />inted out that <br />n the project. <br />on the block. <br />~ the council, <br />ed in order to <br />he number he <br />~r greater than <br />100% pavers, <br />~0% concrete. <br />problems the <br />-king product, <br />~nded that it's <br />h. but is does <br />include the driveways. RG suggested that it would be best to include everything and then start <br />cutting back. There was discussion around how to present the plan. Randy sug ested that the <br />justification should include a request for the city to share in the expense, since the laza design is <br />consistent with the downtown/core area which benefits the city. ~ <br />Curt explained that the first numbers did not include the lights ($84k). He pointe out that this <br />includes seven (7) per block face, which is more than we may really need. It also in ludes four (4) <br />~, bike racks and a total of ten (10) benches, which were not in the bid. Many of the i ems that were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.