My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:48:22 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10326
Title
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
Company
Transit Board
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' ~ . '~ <br />~ <br />' <br />' June 20, 1996 <br /> Mr. Randy Curtis <br />' Facilities Manager <br /> Marion County <br /> 4th Floor Senator Building <br />t 220 High St. N.E. <br /> Salem, OR 97301 <br />z~. s <br />m <br />k~ = <br />• <br />l~e <br />:•~P°~n ME51~Cftt5 :t~ <br />EXHIBIT 6 <br />' RE: RESIGNATION FROM COURTHOUSE SC~UARE REVIEW COMMITTEE <br />r Dear Randy: <br />' Tfiis letter will commemorate our discussion of June 18, wherein I offered my resignation <br />to the committee reviewing the selection of a private partner for the project lalown as <br />"Courthouse Square". <br />My resignation is necessitated and influenced by the points raised below, amongst others: <br />1) I do not think that either of the two RFP submittals meet the objectives of the RFP. <br />2~ I~ aPPo~ ~ g~~g "partner" status to a developer without first understanding a <br />feasible financing structure and comprehensive partnership overview. <br />3) I cannot be an objective advisor to the process after first having undertaken a <br />comprehensive analysis of the project's feasibility, and having determined that my <br />company could provide an alternative to either of the submittals which would directly <br />compete for the award of the contract. <br />4) I am not willin~ to give up mv work product and see others substantially profit from my <br />ttme and effort. <br />- As for points #1, and #2, above, I would remind you that these statements were made <br />~ on the r~ord well in advance of the analysis I have completed in the past two weeks. <br />I sincerely apologize to you and the committee for this situation. When i volunteered <br />~ to undertake an analvsis, I neither intended to spend the amounts of time which were necessary <br />to complete the feasibility study, nor did I expect to conclude that such an analysis would place <br />me in a position of conflict. <br />~ <br />~ Hrul /i.l~i~. C.~nur~ <br />200 H2t•~'^~'^@ Av2 SE. SU~fc ~-3 ~0. Salem. GR 973~' ~ IJVJ) 3,'1-307-: • Fa <=3'-c75o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.