My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:48:22 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10326
Title
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
Company
Transit Board
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, <br />, <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />, <br />Berrey/Frey Ethics Repo~t <br />September 21,1995 <br />In regula~ open publ~c sessio~ the Site Selection Committee Report is presented to, and accepted by, <br />the Transit Board. <br />November 07,1995 <br />RG. Andersen Wyckoff and Randy Curtis make the fust publ"~c prese~tation af the concept for <br />Courfhouse Square in an apen public meeting of fhe Marion County Board of Commiss'~ers, the <br />Salem City Council, and the Transit Boa~d of Dmectors. Up unt~'1 tf~is meeting, the respedive policy <br />bodies had not been involved in the development of the ooncept The meeting was welt attended by <br />represenfatives from the commu~it~r and bus'a~ess. indud'mg Dan Be~def a~d John Henrickso~ of the <br />Statesman Joumal. and was fi~lly reported in the medra the fdlowing day. <br />November 09,1995 <br />' The Transit Board held an open public woric sessio~ witfi statf im which Patrick Heam, Exeaitive <br />Di~ector af the Govemme~t Standards and Pradioes CoRUrussio~ made a presentation reganding <br />Board etti~cs. This session was set by Anderse~rWydcoff in October as part of the Boarci's Team <br />' Bu~d'mg program. Mr. Heam e~lamed what oa~sti4~ted a'potential oo~flid of interesY' and a~ acbual <br />"conflict of art~ and what steps Board membe~s rtwst take to avdd violating SNate law i~ fhis r+egaod. <br />~ <br />' <br />~ <br />~ <br />' <br />~ <br />r <br />' <br />' <br />~ <br />November 30,1995 <br />The Transit Board met in regular open publ'~c session to dis~ss designatio~ of the Senator Blodc as the <br />p~+efened site for the ~ew Do~mtown Trdnsit Ce~ter. "For the ~rci, Oire~ctor Frey stated that he <br />has a cor~flict-of-interest with regard to this discussion, and will refrain from d'~scussion and <br />voting. He has a real estate property listed on the Senator Block. The motion camed 4-0 by <br />Roll Call vote with Director Frey abstai~i~g (Director 8errey not present)." Onoe the Board had <br />designated the site for the projed. the Board also acted to: Fsdorse fhe Cou~house Square conoep~ <br />To ~age the OistricYs sister age~aes to likewise embFaoe the Courthouse Square concep~ and, <br />To request a 3 year moratorium on moving tlie H'~ Str~eet Traru~ Facdity. The motions carried <br />unanimaasly. M~ Frey did ~ot abstain on these issues because they wEr~ r~ot to the hea~t of the <br />issue of acqui~ng the Senator Block; and M~. Bemey was ~ot pr+esent. <br />Oecember 1995 <br />Andersen-Wydcoff became aware of M~. BeR'ey's pote~l inte~st ai becoming the developer of <br />Cou~thouse Square and met with Pahick Heam to d'~scxiss the oonflid of inte~est that fhis would ra~se. <br />Mr. Heam neiterated his comme~ts made at the wotlc session with the Transit Boand in November. <br />say'~ng that as long as M~ BeRey publidy dedared his co~lict of i~ter+est and did nat participate <br />in the discussion or votes related to the project tfiat he would not be in violation of State ethics <br />law. He indicated that M~. Bert'e~s ootiflid was drff~+e~tt from NIr. F~/s in fftat tNr. F~s oonflict had <br />to do only with a listing of a piece of propetiy which the Camty weuld have to aoqui~e for the projed, but <br />Mr. BeReys conflict arose from the project itsetf and, t~+efot+e. fhe enfinety of fhe pr+ojed. He furifi~ <br />indicated that altliough following the e~ias laws would assure that no oo~flict of ~te~est did ocax. that <br />woutd not predude a potential for the public peroeptio~ of a oonflici and the pditical questa~s tliat m~ght <br />raise. He also said tlzat it would be best if M~. F~,~ abstauied o~ al1 i.s~sues ~+elated to fhe final aoquisrtion <br />of fhe site instead of just those related to acquis~tion of 1he properiy he had listed. And~-VVyc~coff <br />infomied ihe 0"mectors of Mr. Heam's carunents and 1t~e Statesman Joumal repo~ted on fhat issue on <br />Deoember 14,1995. <br />• Page 2 <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.