My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:48:22 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10326
Title
Question and Answers to Issues Courthouse Square
Company
Transit Board
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
II <br />~~ <br />Berrey/Frey Ethics Repo~t <br />, <br />"President Caraballo exnressed disarir~ointment in the Rress coverage of yesterday's Public Hearina on <br />, this subject. and said he was extremely disapoointed that the ~ress was not in attendanoe at this time to <br />listen to the Board's further discussion of the issues. Notwithstandin4rxess coveraae this moming. the <br />~roject was deemed a viable ~ject by more lhan a substantial mai~y of the individuals testifying at <br />the Public Hearinqyeste~day.. " The lengthy d'isc;uss'ion went on to reiterate tha~ <br />' ~ The basic concept (fnr Courthouse Square) had not changed since its inception in November 1995 <br />and that what had c~anged was hati the public/private oompone~ts were aRanged; <br />' • That it was e~q~ected to be a$20-$25 m~lion projec~ <br />' • A delineation of transit, c~ounty, and private spaoe; <br />• The be~efits of Transit owned lease spaoe to oover TransiYs ongoing 08~M costs; <br />' • That Transit would var.ate its cume~t Hi~ Street bcati~on and rebum ~ to the traffic and par~ing the <br />City had requested; <br />' • That the project will provide better oppo~bunibes for operating and rider security; <br />• That only half the buses wot~d pulse on High Str~et and half on (~xmdi Stre~ tliereby reduang the <br />anpa~ on fraRic downtoHm; <br />' • That signalization would be changed on both Churoh and High at Court and Chemeketa Streets to <br />provide for bus ing~ess and egress foom Cout~tltouse Square; <br />' • That visual and audible si~als would be ir~alled inr safety of pedestrians at the ing~ss/egress <br />points on Church and High Streets; and, <br />, • That TransiYs portion of the projed was being funded by Federal grants and local match that had <br />already been set aside. ~ <br />' ~irector tCelley moved Uiat fhe Salem Area Transit Board adopt the revised P~~~Y P~ ~ <br />Courthouse Square: ~doPt Resdutio~ #196-08 author¢iiig filing the FTA grant r+eques~ and, autfior¢e <br />tlie Boarcl Preside~t to execute tlie Preliminary Intergovemment~ Ag~t witl~ Marion Camty' The <br />motion passed unanimously with F~y abstaining; and Campbell and Miller absent <br />' September 26,1996 <br />~ The Transit Board met in ~ open Public session and adopted Resdutio~ #9G-09. "Direc~or Kelley <br />moved that fhe Board of Diredors adopt Resdution ~196-09 autl~o~ing the Generel Manager ~ file <br />such amended application ~d documentatio~ as may be neoessary to f~ihate an amendment b~ the <br />, Transit Distrid g~nt t~ incorporate and n~enge fhe Countys grant ~bo one ~ant fnr the Co~xthouse <br />Squat+e pr+Oject.s <br />"Director Frey said he had a potential conflict-of-interest in this issue and would not discuss or <br />' vote on it" The motiorr passed unanimously with Frey abstaining. <br />October 24,1996 <br />' The Transit Boatd, mee~n9 ~~9~' ~ Publ'~c session, acted on several issues t+elated to <br />Cou~thouse Square: <br />~ <br />• Page 5 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.