Laserfiche WebLink
From: "Edward Einowski" <eeinowski@stoel.com> ~ <br />To: GWM1.M-LEGAL(MHANSEN) ' <br />Date: 12/14/98 11:03am ' <br />Subject: Re: Good Cost--Bad Cost Allocation ' <br />I don't know what the impact is on good costs/bad costs~ but I <br />think you're right that it will have some impact. Bill~, Randy <br />and you should look at Exhibit C to the Tax and General' <br />Certificate of the County and tell me what numbers woul~ change <br />as a result of this. Perhaps Craig Lewis also need to ~e <br />involved since he seems to be the "keeper of the budget'. Let <br />me know. , <br />»> MICHAEL HANSEN <MHANSEN@OPENGOVT.OPEN.ORG> 12/14 10:I50 AM »> <br />** High Priority ** ', <br />Ed, <br />We have recorded a correction deed at Reel 1549, Page 5q'7, Marion <br />County Deed Records. Transit now owns 31.290 of the Ser~ator <br />Block. ', <br />This changes the consideration to $1,662,750.60. Transi~,t is owed <br />$569,129.40 as a credit against project costs. The orig~,inal 42% <br />ownership interest carried a consideration of $2,231,880''~,• <br />Marion County has included this consideration in its equ,ity. We <br />suspect ' <br />this will change the good cost--bad cost allocation. ' <br />Please advise us of the impact. , <br />CC: GroupWise 4_1.SMTP("rcurtis@open.org"),GWM2.M~MAR2 <br />