My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MWIC Parkway LLC
Images9
>
Assessors
>
Administration
>
Reviews and Appeals
>
MWIC Parkway LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2021 4:40:27 AM
Creation date
3/31/2020 11:44:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Assessor
Account Number
524822
Assessor Doc Type
Magistrate
Log Number
200093G
Tax Year
2019-20
Assessor Section
Commercial
Petitioner Name
MWIC Parkway LLC
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3/28/2020 2:15 PM <br /> 200093 <br /> 1 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT <br /> MAGISTRATE DIVISION <br /> 2Property Tax <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 MWIC PARKWAY, LLC, ) <br /> ) <br /> 6Plaintiff, ) Case No. 2,e)O b°►l G (for court use only) <br /> ) <br /> 7 ) <br /> vs. ) COMPLAINT <br /> 8 <br /> MARION COUNTY ASSESSOR, )) <br /> 9 Defendant. ) <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Plaintiff hereby files its Complaint as follows: <br /> 1. Plaintiff owns certain real property identified by Defendant Marion County <br /> 12 <br /> Assessor as tax account number R24822 (the"Subject Property"). <br /> 13 2. The Subject Property is appraised by Defendant Marion County Assessor. <br /> 14 3. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Marion County Board of Property Tax <br /> 15 Appeals, which was mailed on February 28, 2020. A true and correct copy of that order is <br /> attached hereto as Exhibit A. <br /> 16 of the SubjectProperty's tax statement is attached <br /> 4. A true and correct copy <br /> 17 hereto as Exhibit B. <br /> 18 5. Market evidence, existing as of the January 1, 2019 valuation date, supports a <br /> reduction in real market value. Plaintiff reasons that such a <br /> reduction is consistent with the value <br /> 19 <br /> in exchange standard embodied within ORS 308.205. <br /> 20 6. Exception value is at issue. <br /> 21 7. The Court should find that the total real market value of the Property as of <br /> 22 January 1, 2019 is no more than $3,200,000. <br /> 8. Furthermore the Court should find that the total real market value of$3,200,000 <br /> 23should be apportioned between land and improvements as follows; $895,500 allocated to land <br /> 24 value and the remaining $2,304,500 allocated to the improvement value. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> COMPLAINT-1 <br /> CKR Law Group,P.C. <br /> 1 ML Jefferson Terrace,Suite 101 <br /> Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 <br /> Phone(503)635-9330 <br /> Fax(503)635-9010 <br /> noticesQckrl awg rou p.co m <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.