Laserfiche WebLink
Department of Environmental Quality <br /> <br />811 SW SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-1390 PHONE (50,3) 229-5696 <br /> <br />Mr. John Smith <br />20852 Filbert Street <br />Aurora, OR 97002 <br /> <br />May ll, 1989 <br /> <br />CERTIFIgD MAIl. <br /> <br />Re: <br /> <br />WQ- SDS-Variance Approval <br />T,L. 90190-400; Sec. 13; <br />T. 4 S.; R. 1 W., W.M.; <br /> Marion County <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Smith: <br /> <br />This correspondence verifies that an information gathering hearing, provided <br />for under Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 340-71-430, was held in Marion <br />County on April 20, 1989, to consider your request to waive certain rules <br />regulating on-site sewage treatment and disposal. Based upon field <br />observations and findings cited below, I am please to advise you that your <br />request for variance from the following on-site rules are granted: <br /> <br />OAR 340-71-205(5) ~- which requires the maintenance of all setbacks <br />between the sewage disposal system and the new mobile home, and that <br />there be sufficient area available to completely replace the absorption <br />facility. <br /> <br />OAR 340-71-220(2)(i)(Table 1)(12) -- which requires the replacement <br />absorption facility maintain a ten (10) foot separation distance from <br />the mobile home, <br /> <br />The property is rectangular in shape, with dimensions of 55 feet by 90 feet. <br />The existing sewage disposal system consists of a steel 750 gallon septic <br />tank and approximately 76 feet of disposal trench. No indication of system <br />malfunction was observed. A pit dug in the area of the proposed <br />repair/replacement area exhibited soil textures of loam over silt loam over <br />very fine sandy loam, with no sign of conditions associated with saturation <br />to a depth of 57 inches. A water meter and water pipe are located in the <br />proposed repair/replacement area, and would need to be relocated to the <br />north property line if system repairs became necessary. <br /> <br />gased upon my review and evaluation of the variance record, it is my opinion <br />that strict compliance with the above-cited rules is inappropriate. The <br />existing system appears to be functioning without indications of failure. <br /> <br /> <br />