AR25-042 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attention Property Owner: A land use proposal has been submitted for property near where you live or near property you own elsewhere. State law requires that the county notify property owners within a certain distance from this property. The proposal and address of the property is described in the "Application" section below. The decision in this case does not directly affect the zoning or use of your property. If you object to the decision, refer to the "Appeal" section. If you have questions, contact the staff person listed at the end of this report. NOTICE OF DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW CASE NO. 25-042 APPLICATION: Application of Dale Petersen for an administrative review to construct a wireless communication facility on the SA zoned portion of a 68.41-acre parcel in an SA (Special Agriculture) and AR (Acreage Residential) zone located at 5125 Valley View Rd SE, Turner (T9S; R2W; Section 29A; Tax lot 200). DECISION: The Planning Director for Marion County has APPROVED the above-described Administrative Review, subject to certain conditions. EXPIRATION DATE: This decision is valid only when exercised by December 26th, 2027 (two years) unless an extension is granted. The effective period may be extended for one year subject to approval of an extension. Request for an extension must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to expiration of the approval (form available from the Planning Division). WARNING: A decision approving the proposal is for land use purposes only. Due to septic, well and drainfield replacement areas, this parcel may not be able to support the proposal. To be sure the subject property can accommodate the proposed use the applicant should contact the Building Inspection Division, (503) 588-5147. This decision does not include approval of a building permit. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall obtain any and all permits, including any subsurface sewage disposal, as required by the Marion County Building Inspection Division. 2. The owner of a utility facility approved under this section shall be responsible for restoring to its former condition as nearly as possible any agricultural land and associated improvements that are damaged or otherwise disturbed by the siting, maintenance, repair or reconstruction of the facility. 3. The development shall significantly conform to the site plan submitted. Minor changes are allowed after review and approval by the Planning Director. OTHER PERMITS, FEES AND RESTRICTIONS: This approval does not remove or affect covenants or restrictions imposed on the subject property by deed or other instrument. The proposed use may require permits and/or fees from other local, state or federal agencies. This decision does not take the place of, or relieve the responsibility for, obtaining other permits or satisfying restrictions or conditions thereon. It is recommended that the agencies mentioned in Finding # below be contacted to identify restrictions or necessary permits. The applicant is advised of the following: 4. The applicants should contact Jefferson Fire District to obtain a copy of the District’s Recommended Building Access and Premise Identification regulations and the Marion County Fire Code Applications Guide. Fire District access standards may be more restrictive than County standards. 5. A portion of the subject parcel is located within an identified “Geologically hazardous area”. Development activities within these areas, including activities such as grading, may require approval of a peer reviewed geological assessment. Applicants should check with Marion County Planning if an activity is regulated prior to commencement if changes to the proposal would include development within these areas. APPEAL PROCEDURE: The Marion County Zone Code provides that certain applications be considered first by the County Planning Director. If there is any doubt that the application conforms with adopted land use policies and regula- tions the Director must deny the application. Anyone who disagrees with the Director's decision may appeal the decision