My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PLA26-003 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
2026
>
Property Line Adjustment
>
PLA26-003 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 12:55:25 PM
Creation date
2/26/2026 12:56:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
26-003
Document_Date
2/26/2026
Land Use Type
Property Line Adjustment
Tax_Lot_Number
091E13C000100
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
20686 FERRY RD SE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. No survey required for properties greater than ten acres per ORS 92.060 (8). <br />2. Property line adjustment deed(s) shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per ORS <br />92.190 (4). <br /> <br />Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. <br /> <br />Stayton Fire District commented: “The access must meet the Marion County Fire Code and information can be <br />found in the application guide.” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an SA zone are listed in Chapter 17.137.090(C) MCC. <br />These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />None of the existing parcels are larger than the minimum parcel size of 80-acres. Therefore this criterion does not <br />apply. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />None of the existing parcels are larger than the minimum parcel size of 80-acres, nor is the minimum parcel size <br />for the area larger than 80-acres. The criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />Neither of the two parcels are in use for agricultural operations. Tax lot 3900 is committed to an approved little <br />league baseball facility with several baseball diamonds dominating the parcel. The reduction in size of this parcel <br />will not have any impact on farming, as the portion of t he property proposed for adjustment could not be <br />incorporated into a farming operation. Tax lot 100 would improve in its ability to be farmed because it will be <br />gaining access to a public road, which it previously did not possess, even though it is not currently in farming <br />production and would likely be a poor candidate due to its location, topography, and current dedication to its use as <br />a woodlot. Therefore the criterion is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common <br />property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains <br />an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant <br />tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to <br />qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br /> <br />Subject tax lot 100, which is the property decreasing in size, is approved for the construction of a dwelling through <br />case AR/FP23-032. Tax lot 3900, which is the property increasing in size, is not approved for a dwelling and does <br />not have an existing dwelling on the property. As such, this proposal does not cause a parcel approved for a dwelling <br />to decrease in size. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for <br />construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting <br />vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger tha n the minimum tract size <br />required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.