Laserfiche WebLink
<br />As stated under the previous section, the parcel increasing in size is the one approved for a dwelling site and it is <br />the “vacant” parcel that will decrease in size. Therefore the criterion is met. <br /> <br />c. Allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage standard to be <br />used to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be based on an <br />acreage standard; or <br /> <br />Tax lot 3900 has not previously been used to qualify a parcel of land for a dwelling previously, so the transfer of <br />land from this parcel will not result in land previously used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage <br />standard to qualify a different parcel for a dwelling. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />d. Adjust a property line that resulted from a subdivision or partition authorized by a Measure 49 <br />waiver so that any lawfully established unit of land affected by the property line adjustment is <br />larger than the size granted by the waiver. <br /> <br />Neither of the two parcels involved in this proposal were subject to a Measure 49 waiver. Therefore, the criterion <br />is met. <br /> <br />5. Any property line adjustment that results in an existing dwelling being located on a different parcel shall <br />not be subject to the standards in MCC 17.136.030(A) so long as the adjustment: <br />a. Does not increase any adverse impacts on the continued practice of commercial agriculture on <br />the resulting parcels; <br />b. Does not increase the potential number of dwellings on the resulting parcels; and <br />c. Does not allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage <br />standard to be used to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be <br />based on an acreage standard. <br /> <br />This proposal would not result in a dwelling being locat ed on a different lot or parcel. Therefore, this section does <br />not apply. <br /> <br />8. The subject parcels, including the majority of the area proposed for transfer are located within the 100-year <br />floodplain of the North Santiam River. As such, development may require approval of a floodplain permit per <br />MCC17.178 Floodplain Overlay Zone. The approval of this property line adjustment does not include approval of <br />any development occurring in the floodplain within the transferred area and the applicants are advised that they <br />should consult with Marion County Planning prior to conducting development on the parcels not covered by <br />previous floodplain development permits. <br /> <br />9. Under MCC 17.172.120(E) Property line adjustment deeds shall be recorded with the Marion County clerk’s <br />office prior to submitting the property line adjustment survey, if a survey is required. Deed recording reference <br />numbers shall be noted on the required survey. <br /> <br /> The Marion County Surveyor commented that a survey is not required based on the proposed configuration. A <br />change in the configuration may alter this requirement. <br /> <br />10. The resulting lots shall significantly conform to the site plan submitted with the proposal. Minor variations are <br />permitted upon review and approval of the Planning Director. <br /> <br />11. Based on the above findings, the applicants’ proposal meets the criteria for a property line adjustment in an EFU <br />zone. The property line adjustment request is, therefore, APPROVED. <br /> <br />Brandon Reich Date: February 26th, 2026 <br />Planning Director/Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />If you have any questions regarding this decision contact Alexander Seifer at (503) 588-5038 <br /> <br />Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder, Vendor or Seller: ORS Chapter 215 requires that if you receive this Notice, it must <br />promptly be forwarded to the purchaser.