Laserfiche WebLink
O1/16/98 08:53 <br />'$503 373 4367 <br />7. Ternr oJcontrect. <br />~I C LEGAL <br />Recammendation: Make it effective June 1, 1997, to Completion Date. <br />8. Fees for pre-construction services. <br />Recommendation: I still think the scope of workwas expanded. If a reasonable fee can be <br />negotiated, It con be paid. An amendment to the cont~act can identify the additional work and <br />the compensation to be paid <br />Variation of 7 and 8. <br />Recommendation: If we can't negotrate on 7 and 8 as recommended, a falt back is to make the <br />contract term from some date when consmtctron management services will begin, say December <br />1, 1997, to Completion Date. We can offer that contract to Melvin Mark <br />This leaves payment far pre-construction servrces unresolved. Let the chips fall where <br />they may. Both parties should be in a position to make their best claims and defense. <br />Q UERY.• Melvin Mark will rarse the issue oJwhether the county will pay jar the pre-construction <br />services, even if transit will not or cannot. I~'ill we? Does this affect the amount we may agree to <br />pay? Even tf both owners srgn the contract, will FTR approve payment of pre-construction <br />services forMelvrn Mark? (In other words, is the county paying the ful! amount by itselJregardless <br />of whether trarlsit signs?) <br />. ~l~, <br />~ ~G.~`~. <br />~ oo2ioo2 <br />THIS FACSIMILE MAY CONTAIN CONFIDEN77AL AT7'ORNEY-CLIENT INFORMATION. IF YOU HAVE <br />RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION BYMISTAKE, PLEASE DO NOT REVIEW OR DISCLOSE INFORMATIONAND <br />CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY. TH.4NK YO U. _ <br />