My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOC Files (Folders 1-3)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
BOC Files (Folders 1-3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:07:50 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 3:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10068
Title
BOC Files (Folders 1-3)
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tri-Aqency Meetinq -7- 11/7/95 <br />4. Urban Renewal assistance <br />to $2 million. <br />5. Street and Walkway Safety <br />to 1995 and moved up all <br />6. Combined local government <br />7. Met the tax coordination <br />for County Service Center up <br />Bond Measure to be moved up <br />subsequent CIP bond measures. <br />tax rate kept below cap. <br />concerns of business. <br />It was indicated that many proposals are on the table from all <br />entities. The proposed amended Property Tax Management Plan <br />provides for these needs within a framework of decreasing tax <br />rates. <br />Proposed Amended Plan <br />Ken Roudybush (County) described the purpose of the Property Tax <br />Management Plan is to forecast the tax implications of the <br />management and service requirements of the City, County, Transit <br />District, Urban Renewal Agency and Regional Library on the "Local <br />Government Combined Property Tax Rate" as established under the <br />1990 Ballot Measure 5. The Plan is also to coordinate those tax <br />implications in a way that recognizes the agencies' mutual and <br />individual public priorities and, thereby, allow their mutual <br />constituencies to review local government services and associated <br />costs as a sum of its parts, rather than individually. In <br />addition, the Plan should coordinate the tax rate needs for local <br />government services in a consistent and ongoing manner which <br />assures that governments party to the Plan will solicit taxpayer <br />support in a non-competitive atmosphere; and to prov.ide the <br />public with a 5-year forecast of the maximum annual tax rate <br />exposure incurred by the proposed services of the individual and <br />combined local governments. <br />He noted that the Plan does not legally restrain the legislative <br />prerogatives of the party agencies, but the public should expect <br />that the parties hereto shall act in a coordinated and <br />cooperative fashion so as to assure the fiscal soundness of the <br />mutual community as a whole. <br />This plan refers only to the funding designations within the <br />$10.00 cap. <br />Mr. Roudybush explained that the Plan is created to look at <br />prioritizing needs, determine when we need them and what we need <br />most. The parties will try not to find each other on the ballot <br />at the same time. Many vot~rs have the opinion that not <br />everything on the ballot should pass. They either take a"pick <br />and choose" attitude or reject everything. The desire is to <br />create a foundation and plan that the public can see for a future <br />tense. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.