Laserfiche WebLink
Streetscape Funding <br />The Committee discussed the City of Salem, Urban Renewal Fund contribution <br />of up to $2 million for streetscape costs. The $1.6 million streetscape are hard <br />costs. The $1.6 million estimate does not include all costs, especially past <br />expense for streetscape. <br />Budget Estimate Discussion <br />Jerry Vessello noted the total hard cost contingency is 12.5 %. He also noted he <br />used A.C.C. one time and found their estimates conservative. <br />David Cameron asked if the current design is different from the previous design <br />to account for the budget estimate change. R.G. Andersen-Wyckoff noted the <br />design has not changed from the original cost estimates. Billy Wasson noted it <br />is the same square footage, same number of parking spaces, and the same <br />project, only the level of detail has improved <br />Maynard Hammer asked how value engineering plays into the new design and <br />estimates? He also noted the tenant improvements on the second floor are <br />$5-$7 lower than other floors. <br />Leonard Lodder noted the change in open floor space design compared to <br />individual offices is one item that has driven down the cost. Individual offices are <br />more expensive to build than open floor space with partitions. <br />R.G. Andersen-Wyckoff responded to the value engineering question. He noted <br />a peer review was conducted by Tri-Met and Lane Transit District. Weekly <br />review of the designs produced discussions on segments and the costs came <br />down as changes were made. Craig Lewis noted tenant improvements came <br />down several hundred thousand dollars when enclosed offices were changed to <br />open floor space. <br />Jerry Vessello said he attended the gas versus electric HVAC system discussion <br />and is satisfied with the choice to use a gas/electric combination with reheat on <br />each floor. The gas boiler room caused a reduction in the number of parking spaces <br />and he is aware of the communities need for downtown parking. <br />PGE Transformer <br />Billy Wasson said his discussion with PGE provides two options. The current <br />design calls for an underground vault transformer in the right of way. PGE did <br />not say we could not do it but there are restrictive conditions. The pay back is <br />six years on a leased transformer from PGE. <br />Maynard Hammer said he wants to make sure the transformer is up out of harms <br />way if it is a flood zone. During the 1996 floods several state buildings were <br />severely damaged because the transformer and power distribution equipment <br />was in the basement. Leonard Lodder noted that is part of the reasoning by <br />PGE. In order to put it above the ground the location would be prime retail <br />space. Another option is to put it on the roof, but there is concern about <br />changing it out in the future and getting a crane into the area to perform the <br />service. This issue has not been resolved. <br />Design Questions <br />Maynard Hammer asked if the building is designed for the anticipated building <br />load. Leonard Lodder said yes. <br />