My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPACE NEEDS <br />Denartment 1993 2013 Growth <br />Assessor 8,652 9,887 14% <br />Board of Commissioners 6,408 8,762 37% <br />Community Development 8,364 10,359 24% <br />Clerk 8,864 9,384 6% <br />District Attorney 18,862 27,301 45% <br />Fiscal Services 3,153 3,286 4$ <br />General Services 12,959 13,525 4% <br />Housing Authority 7,264 7,264 0% <br />Legal Counsel 4,073 4,868 20% <br />Publio Works 2,627 2,627 0% <br />Risk Management 2,410 2,410 0% <br />Solid Waste 3,662 3,832 5% <br />Tax 2,305 2,513 9% <br />Treasurer 1,019 1,019 0% <br />Total 90,622 107,037 18% <br />The Downtown Sub-Committee discussed these figures at length.. We <br />also reviewed the population projections outlined by the <br />consultants. It seemed logical to use Projection A growths <br />recommended by the consultants. That will provide a practical <br />basis from which to make our recommendations. If it proves to be <br />too low, there will always be the option of renting more space, <br />and if it is too high, the county can rent out the excess. <br />We reviewed the adjacency recommendations in the report. The <br />logic of most of the recommendations seemed sound, but there were <br />two that have still not_been resolved. The Clerk~s office has <br />recently rented space in an outlying area. The impact of this <br />move has not yet been determined. We will assume that until more <br />is known, the Clerk's total operation should return to downtown. <br />Our space recommendations are based on that assumption. <br />The other issue not resolved is the location of the Sheriff. The <br />Court Services of the Sheriff~s department will require 2,968 <br />square feet. it is assumed that the Courts Sub-Committee <br />accommodated this. It is further assumed that the Tri-Agency <br />Sub-Committee accommodated the remaining portion of the Sheriff's <br />operation. A statute that requires the Sheriff to be located in <br />the Courthouse is also assumed to be satisfied. <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.