My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~• <br />-~ <br />PUBLIC WORKS FACII..ITY <br />A. FINDINGS <br />1. The Public Works Department is currently working out of five separate <br />facilities. T'he combination of the downtown department with the Public Works-Roads <br />facility at the location of the latter on Silverton Road would save time and money in <br />personnel costs, travel time and equipment needs. <br />It further appears that this consolidation of the downtown and Silverton Road <br />operations at the latter location would better serve the public, particularly if a small Public <br />Works office is retained downtown to work in close proximity with the Community <br />Development Department. <br />B. COST FACTORS <br />1. This facility will be funded through Public Works funds. <br />2. Preliminary estimates place the cost at approximately $2 million. <br />3. Reserves will be set aside over the next year and a half to pay for the facility <br />4. Further study is needed to determine actual feasibility for this project. <br />C. OPTIONS CONSIDERID <br />1. There were two options considered for accommodating the Public Works staff <br />2. One option was to maintain full staffing for Administration, Engineering and <br />Survey downtown. This was considered the least efficient use of Public Works funds. <br />3. The savings and productivity gains were best realized with the second option <br />of moving to our Roads facility. The second option also provided greater customer service <br />to our customer base. <br />PAGE 1 <br />ksj/cd/PublicWorks. 03/10/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.