My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
department or agency. While department and agency <br />representatives and the subcomm.ittees which have examined <br />each area of county service have certainly not been reticent in <br />advancing their individual causes, they have without exception <br />operated with a county-wide perspective, in which each <br />recognized the importance of the whole. This cooperative team <br />approach has been very much appreciated by the steering <br />committee. <br />8. Beginning with the 1991 in-house study, and leading through the <br />last three years of work by the WEGroup, the county facilities <br />subcommittees and the steering committee, the county has now <br />invested nearly four years in developin~ its master facilities plan. <br />It is now time to move from planning to action -- to begin <br />implementing the plan. But while the county should now <br />commence implementation, it should certainly not call a halt to <br />planning for its future facilities needs. The steering committee <br />believes that the county's facilities needs are a eat at this <br />moment primarily because in retrospect, too little attention has <br />been paid in the past to long range planning for facilities needs. <br />We also know that, just as the county's needs have evolved <br />during the last four years, they will continue to evolve over the <br />20 year period covered by the plan. Therefore, we recommend <br />that the Commissioners establish a mechanism for ongoing <br />periodic review of the master facilities plan, to insure that it is <br />PAGE 7 <br />ksj/cd/Facilities.Int 03/18/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.