Laserfiche WebLink
Marion County Facilities Master Plan <br />Exhibit 23 <br />Cost oC Leased Regional Facilities, October, 1993 <br />Lease Annuel EsL Tax <br />Besis Lease Exemption <br />LoeatioNDepertrnenVAddress (RS~ Cost CosVYr <br />Total Equivalent <br />Annunl Cost Per <br />Cost RSF/Mo. Expiration Dete <br />. ~ <br />. ~ <br />L <br />T <br />.~ <br />f <br />East Salem <br />Juetiee CourL 575 Lencnster Drive NE 1,800 E17.688 NA E17.688 E0.82 Juneso.icc~ - <br /> <br />Staylon ~ <br />JustieeCourt.171 WestLocus~Ste.3 2,000 59.720 51.337 E77.057 50.46 dunaso.ioo~ <br />Juverilo. 1750 Wilco Roed ± 4,700 E22,800 E4,091 E26,897 50.48 sapumwrao.2oo0 ~ ~ <br /> <br />SheriH, ShaH Roed -~ ~ <br />1.440 <br />54,200 <br />57.509 <br />E5,709 <br />50.33 <br />Sepbmber 1, 1C05 ~ <br />Woodbum . <br />Health.302WesiHeyesSbeet 2,300 572,240 b1.637 E13,B77 50.50 Jurw30,iG95 ~r <br />Justice Court. 1159 Young Street 535 E4,800 NA 54.800 5075 enonm-m-monm I <br />Juvenile, 345 North 2nd Street 2,700 573.200 57.447 574.641 50.45 July 1, t99a ~ <br />TOTAUAverage 15,475 EB4,648 570,015 , 594,669 $0.54 j <br />Noter. ~ <br />~VI Oeln es ol OcwDer. 1993. ~ . <br />EsCmelatl tac aiempGOn coat per yvu ia ea4male0 velue ol u~collecleC property tazes on Co~nry-IeexO olicea as providaA by tlre <br />Merion Counry Nseasor.OcroEer. 1093. . ~ <br />lease tlab wu~ce: Menon Co~nry Risk Mernpertqnt DePenmenl atoDe~. 1GV3. <br />None of the departmenu expressing interest in providing services at regional center(s) indicated ~ <br />that staffing such facilities would reduce the staffing demand at their central, Salem offices. <br />Development of each regional center would require the addition of the shared-cos[ staff; likely ~ <br />six positions when relief staff are included. It must be recognized that the decision to provide <br />a"full service" regional service center, increasing level of service delivery, will have staff cost ~- <br />associated with it. T'his regional service center concept will minimize the need for addiGonal ~ <br />staff while providing as many of the County's services as possible from remote locations. <br />r <br />T'herefore, the decision to consolidate regional offices into service center(s) should be founded ~ <br />in the County's policy to extend services to remote locations. If the County seeks to simply <br />maintain the presence of existing Woodbum and Stayton offices without adding new regional - <br />department services, con6nued use of smaller, independent leased spaces is most likely a less _ <br />expensive altemative to development of County-owned facilities. Even at this option, the County <br />should be prepared to incur greater costs to upgrade or relocate independent offices to other ~ <br />facilities to insure that health, life-safety, ADA and other criteria aze met. - <br />Page 54 <br />