My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Demolition/Abatement Constracts (Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Demolition/Abatement Constracts (Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:19:28 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 10:26:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10111
Title
Demolition/Abatement Constracts (Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
h. Awards to Responsible Contractors. Grantees shall make awards only to responsible contractors possessing the ability <br />to perform successfully under the tert~s and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration shall be given to such <br />matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, racord of past performance> and financial and technical <br />resources. <br />i. Written Record of Procurement Histoty_, Grantees shall maintain records detailing the history of a procurement. At a <br />minimum, these records shall include; <br />(1) the rationaie for the method of procurement, <br />(2) selection of contract type, <br />(3) reasons for contractor selecti~ or rejection, and <br />(4) the basis for the contract price <br />j. Use of Time and Materials Type Contracts. Grantees will use time and material type contracts only: <br />(1) Atier a determination that no other type of contract is suitable; and <br />(2) If the contract specifies a ceiling price that the contractor shall not exceed except at its own risk. <br />k. Responsibility for Settlement of Contract Issues/Disputes. Grantces alone will be responsible in accordance with good <br />administrative practice and sound business judgment for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising <br />out of procurements. <br />T't~ese issues include, but are not limitod to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and claims. These standards do not relieve <br />the grantee of any contractual responsibility under its contracts. <br />FTA will not substitute its judgment for that of the grantee or subgrantee, unless the matter is primarily a Federal concem. <br />Violations of the law will be refeired w the local, State, or Federal suthority having proper jurisdiction. <br />1. Written Protes~t Procedures. Grantces shall have written protest procedures to handle and resolve disputes relating to their <br />procurements and shall in all instanxs disclose information regarding the protest to FTA. All protest decisions must be in <br />writing. A protester must exhaust all administrative remedies with the grentce before pursuing a protest with FTA. <br />Reviews of protests by FTA will be limited to a grantce's failure to have or follow its protest procedures, or its failure to <br />review a complaint or protest. An appeal to FTA must be received by the cognizant FTA regional or Headquarters Office <br />within five (5) working days of the dste the protester lrnew or shouid have lrnown of the violation. <br />Violations of Federal Iaw or regulation wili be handle~ by the complaint process stated within that law or regulation. <br />Violations of State or local law or regulations will be under the jurisdiction of State or local authorities. <br />m. Contract Period of Performance Limitation. Grantees shall not tnter into any contract with a period of performance <br />excceding five (5) years inclusive of options without prior written FTA approval. <br />8. COMPETTTION. <br />a. Full and Open Com ition. All procurement transactions will be conducted in a manner providing full and open <br />competition. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition include, but are not limited to; <br />(1) Unreasonable r~quirements placod on fums in order for them to qualify to do business; <br />(2) Unnecessary ~xperienoe and excessive bonding requirements; <br />(3) Noncompetitive pricing practices between fi~ms or between affiliated companies; <br />(4) Noncompetitive awards to any pecson or fum on retainer contracts; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.