|
-.,~~_ ~, . , -
<br />.~~ -~_._
<br />. , j~~~s, ,
<br />. . . ~ Y'y a. ~ .. .
<br />.. . . k 1'~ .' ~ ~r . ~ . .
<br />Prior to moving ahead with this LEED cerdfication; t~a~ouiiit~ hited ~iarding ~.awson ., ~` " ;
<br />~,~~-
<br />to review the bid documents,and work with~'tlie desigcr ~caar ta ass~s if we could m~~ "' ~:. ;,' ~`
<br />q i 3 a li Scation for the I.EED ccrtification. . HI.A Las detenmmed d~a#,.~caa obmiri the 2'L ~~ ., '~
<br />rcach a branu ccrtification:! ~ ~ - r ~ ~ ~ ~ a y~ .,~~ <.:
<br />' .... i r; ~.+.M~,7'~~: ,. -~r:z s.cl
<br />- . . , , ~ ~ i ~ .,~.,.r.. .N ..A, - f.? s~_ ,
<br />Due ta these findings thc county can move ahead`~vith t}ie MOIT''to become part of the ' ~.°`` }~
<br />The MOtt is noeded to define the parties' rales an~ use of prog~am matcrials collected p~ot~ .
<br />P~$~~, z~" .
<br />~~~.' .~:.
<br />. . - .. g ~<.:;~q'~i- . . ~ . .
<br />' . . - . ~ ~ ~i w .
<br />~.4C81IIIIp1Ct ~ ~; ~,3,'~~:~. ~~'~
<br />M>.-
<br />With the Couaty's interest in being enviromnentally sensitive, the dasign and equipment s~xci5cations.
<br />took this int~ conside,cation early on in ~ projxt T~us, tlucost associated with environm~j~ f~dly .
<br />aspocta a+aa, for the m~t part, considered as part of thd'projoct cost. Becausc of tbis, separate bid li~ _
<br />itcros were not requested and an actual ~rost cannot be delineated for tLose overlapping items tbat were
<br />bothconsideseddasirableandfelli~otheLEEDprog~ram. In~d~tion,becausemaayofth'e" ~m~rovements
<br />w~l provide long tctm saviag in ~-, vvatcr cons~m~tian a~d hesl~y environment, it is di~cutt to .. ~
<br />. .
<br />dett~mine the off~ing cost tbat w~l be realized ovGr the life of this fac~7ity. . .
<br />However, a~}r projcct changes occurring during construction noed to.be addressed. The majority of the
<br />design changes aceded to meet the 22 point criteria of the LEED prog~ram were either incorporatcd in the
<br />bid documcnts or have becn addressod wder chatige ordr~s approved foz the fac~ity. Thcre st~l remains
<br />~ sav~al c,~s~a~_tbat ~v~l be i+oqun~d to f~11Y ~P2Y witb dra~LBBD czitieria. To data~re hav~e not
<br />ieceiv~ed. cost ~stimates for these itans. Tlee majo~ aaes are ~the ivdoo~r air qnality plan and tba VOC ~
<br />sensors. These are curr~nttX bein8 P~ ~~~ 8~ ~8~:t~e normal change o~r procesa. It is ' . y~
<br />~imated t~-at &~se w~l be imd~r 515,000. . , ~ : .,:, : ~ ,
<br />• • ~ ~ ~
<br />. q~
<br />C~aagt=:.Oi~t,~8"p~+o0essod to date tbat at+0 aSSOCia~ed ~irith LEED csrtetl8 at+e: ,
<br />.' `~ UPB~e of 8~8 and provide light harv~.stmg ('i4 to solid waste) ~'~ 523,380 ~~~ '
<br />: In addition, coasnltant cost for pro}oc~ ~ .
<br />~ 8LA `co~ (sofid waste funds/n~ot project cost) . ~ . $41,119 - .
<br />~ A=bucklc Cos~hic =Architccts ' ~ . ~ , ~ . .
<br />F.ntering into the MOU will not bind the crnmty should ~we elect to withdraw from this progiram in the
<br />~ fuUu~e. . .
<br />Departments Tmgacted ~ .
<br />There are cost associated with envimnmcntal design. They have been incoiporated into the project cost
<br />and w~l become part of the rent structure. ~
<br />t' ~
<br />. ~:~;..
<br />: ttons ~'or Gonsideration ~
<br />~:- ApPz+o~ve 9~e MOU to obRain LEED oertificatian.
<br />::~;: . Not appro!vg,~o;~MOU ~and elect not.b~ be pait of the LEID progcam
<br />• af.T' ,. '-'~u'tfC~`. . . • . . . .
<br />. -;: . . Recommendation . . _
<br />~.~. - .
<br />`~ Tt is recommended that the Board of Commissioners appmve~the MOU~aad Uecome pazt of the nationwide
<br />.11~5> .
<br />-, USG~C. ~LEED program. ~ . .
<br />.. . . ... c:~~;;- . • . `
<br />- . .. ~ . .:~ir_~-:.~~ • . . ... .
<br />::`bS~~.~. ... ' -^. . .
<br />~a^.YA~S~:r~-,... ~r. ~ - , . _ .
<br />
|