My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Northblock- RFD Drafts
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Northblock- RFD Drafts
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:30:46 PM
Creation date
8/16/2011 3:54:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10260
Title
Northblock- RFD Drafts
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
emo <br />1b: RFP Sub-Committee <br />From: R. G. Andersen-Wyckoff, General Manager <br />Date: May 27, 1998 <br />Re: RFP Development Process <br />The following process is presented as a basis for discussion: <br />1. Committee determuie design conditions and/or design parameters desired from <br />successful RFP ie. types of uses, height requirements, architectural compatibility, access <br />to transit mall,. security issues, parl~ng issues, service issues, construction timing, <br />contamination issues. <br />2. Committee discussion of FTA requirements and what effect, if any, they will have on the <br />RFP development and selection process. Also discussion of RFP timing and which <br />agency will take lead. <br />~ 3. Committee host meeting with development community to discuss what they would want <br />to see in an RFP for a project such as this with emphasis on creative flexibility and FTA <br />limitations. Discuss the committee's concepts from # 1 above. Discuss suggested RFP <br />timing. <br />4. Committee discussion of results of development meeting and dete~nuiation of suggested <br />criteria for inclusion in RFP. Determine timing recomrr~endation. <br />S. Preparation of draft RFP by Melvin Mark Co. in conjunction with Transit legal counsel. <br />6. Committee review of draft RFP and revision, if necessary by Melvin Mark/Transit legal. <br />7. Review of revised draft RFP by Joint Coordinating Team, including RFP timing issue. <br />8. Committee revisions based on JCT comments, if necessary by Melvin Mark/Transit <br />legal. <br />9. Submittal of suggested RFP to County and Transit Boards for approval and timing. <br />10. Commence RFP legal process in acxordance with approved timing. <br />• Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.