My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Consultation Report (2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Consultation Report (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2014 11:29:07 AM
Creation date
8/17/2011 10:57:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10325
Title
Consultation Report
Company
Palmer Grouth& Pietrka
BLDG Date
2/13/1998
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Design - Planning
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
According to the contract for professional services, we have compared the present value of the <br />cost of renting space at market levels for Class A/B buildings with the projected construction cost. <br />Additionally, we compared the present value of the cost of market rent to the present value of <br />scheduled contract rent and reversionary value of the building. The specified period is fiscal year <br />7uly 1, 1999, to fiscal year 2025, which is represented as a 26-year period. <br />The estimated market rent is based on a market rent survey of Salem CBD Class A/B buildings. <br />The concluded lease rates will then be analyzed (using discounted cash flow analysis) with a <br />discount to present value of the proposed total lease income for the Marion County space <br />compared to the reported cost to build the Marion County office space, exclusive of the Transit <br />District's contribution. This technique will be identified as Technique l. The second technique <br />will compare the present value of the lease income stream to the proposed contract/ownership, <br />which includes the proposed contract amount ($1.30/SF) plus the reversion at the end of the <br />26-year period of the land and building value. These two techniques will be summarized in the <br />Summary section. <br />The Salem office market is influenced by the overall economic influences on the Salem <br />metropolitan azea. The area has displayed positive economic influences, with the recent U. S. <br />Territory 1998 Regional Economic Review and Forecast by the Economics Department of <br />US Bank stating: <br />"The Salem metropolitan area offers the stability of a state capitol complex, a <br />productive, diverse agricultural sector, forest products, one of the State's most popular <br />tourist destinations, a growing technology sector, and the stimulus of a private <br />university. All of this is within one hour's drive of a large, rapidly growing urban <br />area. This is a combination that should result in continued strong growth in Salem, <br />despite the leveling out in the State government complex." <br />According to information from the Salem/Keizer Market Update 1997 Overview and 1998 <br />Forecast provided by Coldwell Banker, the Salem area's office market remained healthy in 1997, <br />closing the year with a 5.9 percent overall vacancy rate. The vacancy rate has increaseti slightly <br />over 1996 because of new construction completion, and a change in the methodology of tracking <br />space. The report indicates that State and County governments continue to lease space, occupying <br />former retail buildings and new Class A office space because they are unable to find large blocks <br />of contiguous space elsewhere. The report indicates that the State entered into and renewed leases <br />C98052 ppi,ly(ER, GROTH & PIETKA, INC. 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.